HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
BEFORE THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
2004 Ron Paul 43:1
Mr. Speaker, I support HR 4663, the Spending Control Act of 2004, because I
believe
those of us concerned about the effects of excessive government
spending on
American liberty and prosperity should support any effort to rein in
spending.
However, I hold no great expectations that this bill will result in a
new dawn
of fiscal responsibility. In fact, since this bill is unlikely to pass
the
Senate, the main effect of today’s vote will be to allow members to
brag to
their constituents that they voted to keep a lid on spending. Many of
these
members will not tell their constituents that later this year they will
likely
vote for a budget busting, pork laden, omnibus spending bill that most
members
will not even have a chance to read before voting! In fact, last week,
many
members who I am sure will vote for HR 4663 voted against cutting
funding for
the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). Last November, many of these
same
members voted for the greatest expansion of the welfare state since the
Great
Society. If Congress cannot even bring itself to cut the budget of the
NEA or
refuse to expand the welfare state, what are the odds that Congress
will make
the tough choices necessary to restore fiscal order, much less
constitutional
government?
2004 Ron Paul 43:2
Even
if this bill becomes law, it is likely that the provision in this bill
allowing
spending for emergency purposes to exceed the bill’s spending caps will
prove
to be an easily abused loophole allowing future Congresses to avoid the
spending
limitations in this bill. I am also concerned that, by not applying the
spending
caps to international or military programs, this bill invites future
Congresses
to misplace priorities, and ignores a major source of fiscal
imprudence.
Congress will not get our fiscal house in order until we seriously
examine our
overseas commitments, such as giving welfare to multinational
corporations and
subsidizing the defense of allies who are perfectly capable of
defending
themselves.
2004 Ron Paul 43:3
Congress already has made numerous attempts to restore fiscal discipline, and
none of
them has succeeded. Even the much-heralded “surpluses” of the nineties
were
due to the Federal Reserve creating an economic boom and Congress
continuing to
raid the social security trust fund. The surplus was not caused by a
sudden
outbreak of fiscal conservativism in Washington, DC.
2004 Ron Paul 43:4
The only way Congress will cease excessive spending is by rejecting the
idea that
the federal government has the authority and the competence to solve
all ills,
both domestic and international. If the last century taught us
anything, it was
that big government cannot create utopia. Yet, too many members believe
that we
can solve all economic problems, eliminate all social ills, and bring
about
worldwide peace and prosperity by simply creating new federal programs
and
regulations. However, the well-intended efforts of Congress have
exacerbated
America’s economic and social problems. Meanwhile our international
meddling
has failed to create perpetual peace but rather lead to perpetual war
for
perpetual peace.
2004 Ron Paul 43:5
Every member of Congress has already promised to support limited government
by
swearing to uphold the United States Constitution. The Constitution
limits the
federal government to a few, well-defined functions. A good start
toward
restoring Constitutional government would be debating my Liberty
Amendment (H.J.Res.
15). The Liberty Amendment repeals the Sixteenth Amendment, thus
eliminating the
income tax the source of much of the growth of government and loss of
individual
liberty. The Liberty Amendment also explicitly limits the federal
government to
those functions it is constitutionally authorized to perform.
2004 Ron Paul 43:6
If Congress were serious about reining in government, it would also
eliminate the
Federal Reserve Board’s ability to inflate the currency. Federal
Reserve
policy enables excessive government spending by allowing the government
to
monitorize the debt, and hide the cost of big government through the
hidden tax
of inflation.
2004 Ron Paul 43:7
In 1974, during debate on the Congressional Budget Reform and Impoundment
Control
Act, Congressman H.R. Gross, a libertarian-conservative from Iowa,
eloquently
addressed the flaws in thinking that budget process reform absent the
political
will to cut spending would reduce the size of government. Mr. Speaker,
I would
like to conclude my remarks by quoting Mr. Gross:
2004 Ron Paul 43:8
Every Member knows that he or she
cannot for long spend $75,000 a year on a salary of $42,500 and remain
solvent. Every Member knows this Government cannot forever spend
billions beyond tax revenue and endure.
2004 Ron Paul 43:9
Congress already has the tools to halt the headlong flight into bankruptcy. It holds the purse strings. No President can impound funds
or spend unwisely unless an improvident, reckless Congress makes
available the money.
2004 Ron Paul 43:10
I repeat, neither this nor any other legislation will provide morality and responsibility on the part of Members of Congress.