2004 Ron Paul 42:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise to explain my objection to H. Res. 676. I certainly join my
colleagues in urging Americans to celebrate
the progress this country has made in race relations.
However, contrary to the claims of the
supporters of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and
the sponsors of H. Res. 676, the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 did not improve race relations or
enhance freedom. Instead, the forced integration
dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased
racial tensions while diminishing individual
liberty.
2004 Ron Paul 42:2
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 gave the federal government unprecedented power over
the hiring, employee relations, and customer
service practices of every business in the
country. The result was a massive violation of
the rights of private property and contract,
which are the bedrocks of free society. The
federal government has no legitimate authority
to infringe on the rights of private property
owners to use their property as they please
and to form (or not form) contracts with terms
mutually agreeable to all parties. The rights of
all private property owners, even those whose
actions decent people find abhorrent, must be
respected if we are to maintain a free society.
2004 Ron Paul 42:3
This expansion of federal power was based on an erroneous interpretation of the congressional
power to regulate interstate commerce.
The framers of the Constitution intended the
interstate commerce clause to create a free
trade zone among the states, not to give the
federal government regulatory power over
every business that has any connection with
interstate commerce.
2004 Ron Paul 42:4
The Civil Rights act of 1964 not only violated the Constitution and reduced individual
liberty; it also failed to achieve its stated goals
of promoting racial harmony and a color-blind
society. Federal bureaucrats and judges cannot
read minds to see if actions are motivated
by racism. Therefore, the only way the federal
government could ensure an employer was
not violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was
to ensure that the racial composition of a
businesss workforce matched the racial composition
of a bureaucrat or judges defined
body of potential employees. Thus, bureaucrats
began forcing employers to hire by racial
quota. Racial quotas have not contributed to
racial harmony or advanced the goal of a
color-blind society. Instead, these quotas encouraged
racial balkanization, and fostered racial
strife.
2004 Ron Paul 42:5
Of course, America has made great strides in race relations over the past forty years.
However, this progress is due to changes in
public attitudes and private efforts. Relations
between the races have improved despite, not
because of, the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
2004 Ron Paul 42:6
In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I join in sponsors of H. Res. 676 in promoting racial
harmony and individual liberty, the fact is the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not accomplish
these goals. Instead, this law unconstitutionally
expanded federal power, thus reducing liberty.
Furthermore, by prompting race-based
quotas, this law undermined efforts to achieve
a color-blind society and increased racial
strife. Therefore, I must oppose H. Res. 676.