2003 Ron Paul 119:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I am opposed to this ill-conceived and ill-timed bill. I would like
to remind my colleagues that according to our
own Constitution, Congress is prohibited from
making any law respecting the establishment
of religion or the free exercise thereof. Yet
are we not doing that today — albeit in a country
some 10,000 miles away? Why on earth
are we commending one particular church in
Vietnam in the name of religious freedom?
At the risk of being blunt, what business is the
Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam of the
United States Congress? The answer, of
course, is that this legislation is of a much
more political than a religious nature: this bill
tells the Vietnamese government how it should
enforce its own constitution, commits the
United States government to promoting religious
freedom in Vietnam, and tells the U.S.
embassy staff in Vietnam to closely monitor
religious issues in Vietnam. It is an attempt to
meddle in the affairs of Vietnam and force
them to adopt the kinds of laws we think they
should have. Mr. Speaker, as much as we
value our own religious liberty, we must
realize
that setting the example of the benefits of
a society that values such liberty is much
more effective than demanding that other
countries pass the kinds of laws we want them
to pass. The unintended consequences of this
otherwise well-meaning legislation is that relations
with the Vietnamese government will
likely suffer, making it less likely that Vietnams
leaders look favorably upon our own
history of religious liberty.