2003 Ron Paul 118:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, today we are once again voting to take our Nation further down
the path toward a system of centralized Federal
planning of our energy supply. The very
notion of a national energy policy is collectivist;
it assumes that an energy supply would
not exist without a government plan. Yet basic
economics teaches us that nothing could be
further from the truth.
2003 Ron Paul 118:2
The best energy policy is the free market! Energy is no different than any other commodity
— free market, competition produces the
most efficient allocation of resources. In a true
free market, conservation of scarce energy resources
occurs naturally. When coal, natural
gas, or other nonrenewable sources are depleted,
the price goes up. When alternative
energy sources like wind and solar become
economically feasible, demand for such
sources arises naturally. There is always a
natural market for clean and cheap energy.
Only an unregulated free market creates the
environment that allows critical technological
innovation to flourish, innovation that holds the
key to cheaper and cleaner energy.
2003 Ron Paul 118:3
The approach we take today, however, distorts the market and favors certain industries
and companies at the expense of American
taxpayers.
2003 Ron Paul 118:4
Its always the same old story in Washington: instead of allowing the free market to
work, Congress regulates, subsidizes, and
taxes an industry, and when inevitable problems
arise, the free market is blamed! The solution
is always more Federal intervention; no
one suggests that too much Federal involvement
created the problems in the first place.
2003 Ron Paul 118:5
Let me provide just a few examples of the most egregious, wasteful spending measures
and corporate subsidies contained in this legislation:
It spends even more than the President
requested; it provides $90 million in subsidies
for hydroelectric power plants; it provides
$500 million for research and development
of Biomass; it authorizes almost $2 billion
for the Energy Department to do what the
private sector would if it was profitable — develop
hydrogen cars; it allows FERC to use
eminent domain to ride roughshod over State
and local governments; it increases failed ethanol
subsidies to favored agribusiness companies,
while providing liability protection for
those companies; it requires States to reduce
energy consumption by 25 percent in 2010, including
States with growing populations like
Texas; it forces taxpayers to guarantee loans
for pipeline projects, despite the easy availability
of cheap credit; it spends $20 million for
the Labor Department to recruit and train Alaskan
employees to build a new pipeline; and it
authorizes the Energy Department to create
efficiency standards for vending machines!
2003 Ron Paul 118:6
Mr. Speaker, this conference report represents the usual pork, subsidies, protectionism,
and regulations that already distort
our energy markets. I strongly urge my colleagues
to vote no on this terrible bill.