2003 Ron Paul 120:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise to oppose this legislation but want to make it clear that I am
not doing so because I oppose religious freedom,
as one might falsely conclude from the
way this bill is crafted. My concerns with this
bill are the same concerns I raise whenever
Congress attempts to act in areas in which it
has no constitutional authority: under the guise
of promoting a laudable cause — religious freedom
— this legislation seeks to impose our
views of this topic on other sovereign nations.
In short, it is yet another example of the U.S.
meddling in the affairs of other countries.
2003 Ron Paul 120:2
Mr. Speaker, as Americans we have a special attachment to the idea of religious freedom.
That is the reason many of our ancestors
came to this land and fought for independence.
But I dont think the way to advance
religious freedom around the world is to
demand that every country adopt our approach.
I believe that so demanding will only
engender ill-will toward the United States and,
ironically, increased resistance to this idea.
People generally to not like being told by foreign
countries what to do or how they can
worship. I believe the best way we can promote
the idea of religious liberty abroad is to
serve as a working, living example of the benefits
of liberty. The United States has been admired
historically in other countries because
our system of government demonstrates the
economic and other benefits of liberty. That is
why other nations seek to emulate the United
States, not because we demand that their religious
laws conform to our notions of what is
acceptable.