2001 Ron Paul 68:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr.
Speaker, today were
being asked to choose between two options dealing with the
controversies surrounding cloning and stem cell research.
2001 Ron Paul 68:2
As an obstetrician
gynecologist with 30 years of experience with strong pro-life
convictions I find this debate regarding stem cell research and human
cloning off-track, dangerous, and missing some very important points.
2001 Ron Paul 68:3
This debate is one
of the most profound ethical issues of all times. It has moral,
religious, legal, and ethical overtones.
2001 Ron Paul 68:4
However, this
debate is as much about process as it is the problem we are trying to
solve.
2001 Ron Paul 68:5
This dilemma
demonstrates so clearly why difficult problems like this are made much
more complex when we accept the notion that a powerful centralized
state should provide the solution, while assuming it can be done
precisely and without offending either side, which is a virtual
impossibility.
2001 Ron Paul 68:6
Centralized
governments solutions inevitably compound the problem were trying to
solve. The solution is always found to be offensive to those on the
losing side of the debate. It requires that the loser contribute
through tax payments to implement the particular program and ignores
the unintended consequences that arise. Mistakes are nationalized when
we depend on Presidential orders or a new federal law. The assumption
that either one is capable of quickly resolving complex issues is
unfounded. We are now obsessed with finding a quick fix for this
difficult problem.
2001 Ron Paul 68:7
Since federal
funding has already been used to promote much of the research that has
inspired cloning technology, no one can be sure that voluntary funds
would have been spent in the same manner.
2001 Ron Paul 68:8
There are many
shortcomings of cloning and I predict there are more to come. Private
funds may well have flowed much more slowly into this research than
when the government/taxpayer does the funding.
2001 Ron Paul 68:9
The notion that
one person, i.e., the President, by issuing a Presidential order can
instantly stop or start major research is frightening. Likewise, the
U.S. Congress is no more likely to do the right thing than the
President by rushing to pass a new federal law.
2001 Ron Paul 68:10
Political wisdom in
dealing with highly charged and emotional issues is not likely to be
found.
2001 Ron Paul 68:11
The idea that the
taxpayer must fund controversial decisions, whether it be stem cell
research, or performing abortion overseas, I find repugnant.
2001 Ron Paul 68:12
The original
concept of the republic was much more suited to sort out the pros and
cons of such a difficult issue. It did so with the issue of capital
punishment. It did so, until 1973, with the issue of abortion. As with
many other issues it has done the same but now unfortunately, most
difficult problems are nationalized.
2001 Ron Paul 68:13
Decentralized
decision making and privatized funding would have gone a long way in
preventing the highly charged emotional debate going on today regarding
cloning and stem cell research.
2001 Ron Paul 68:14
There is danger in
a blanket national prohibition of some questionable research in an
effort to protect what is perceived as legitimate research. Too often
there are unintended consequences. National legalization of cloning and
financing discredits life and insults those who are forced to pay.
2001 Ron Paul 68:15
Even a national
law prohibiting cloning legitimizes a national approach that can later
be used to undermine this original intent. This national approach rules
out states from passing any meaningful legislation and regulation on
these issues.
2001 Ron Paul 68:16
There are some
medical questions not yet resolved and careless legislation may impede
legitimate research and use of fetal tissue. For instance, should a
spontaneously aborted fetus, non-viable, not be used for stem cell
research or organ transplant? Should a live fetus from an ectopic
pregnancy removed and generally discarded not be used in research? How
is a spontaneous abortion of an embryo or fetus different from an
embryo conceived in a dish?
2001 Ron Paul 68:17
Being pro-life and
pro-research makes the question profound and I might say best not
answered by political demagogues, executive orders or emotional hype.
2001 Ron Paul 68:18
How do problems
like this get resolved in a free society where government power is
strictly limited and kept local? Not easily, and not perfectly, but I
am confident it would be much better than through centralized and
arbitrary authority initiated by politicians responding to emotional
arguments.
2001 Ron Paul 68:19
For a free society
to function, the moral standards of the people are crucial. Personal
morality, local laws, and medical ethics should prevail in dealing with
a subject such as this. This law, the government, the bureaucrats, the
politicians cant make the people more moral in making these judgments.
2001 Ron Paul 68:20
Laws inevitably
reflect the morality or immorality of the people. The Supreme Court did
not usher in the 60s revolution that undermined the respect for all
human life and liberty. Instead, the peoples attitude of the 60s led
to the Supreme Court Roe vs. Wade ruling in 1973 and contributed to a
steady erosion of personal liberty.
2001 Ron Paul 68:21
If a centralized
government is incapable of doing the right thing, what happens when the
people embrace immorality and offer no voluntary ethical approach to
difficult questions such as cloning?
2001 Ron Paul 68:22
The government
then takes over and predictably makes things much worse. The government
cannot instill morality in the people. An apathetic and immoral society
inspires centralized, rigid answers while the many
consequences to come are ignored. Unfortunately, once centralized
government takes charge, the real victim becomes personal liberty.
2001 Ron Paul 68:23
What can be done?
The
first step Congress should take is to stop all funding of research for
cloning and other controversial issues. Obviously all research in a
free society should be done privately, thus preventing this type of
problem. If this policy were to be followed, instead of less funding
being available for research, there would actually be more.
2001 Ron Paul 68:24
Second, the
President should issue no Executive Order because under the
Constitution he does not have the authority either to promote or stop
any particular research nor does the Congress. And third, there should
be no sacrifice of life. Local law officials are responsible for
protecting life or should not participate in its destruction.
2001 Ron Paul 68:25
We should continue
the ethical debate and hope that the medical leaders would voluntarily
do the self-policing that is required in a moral society. Local laws,
under the Constitution, could be written and the reasonable ones could
then set the standard for the rest of the nation.
2001 Ron Paul 68:26
This problem
regarding cloning and stem cell research has been made much worse by
the federal government involved, both by the pro and con forces in
dealing with the federal governments involvement in embryonic
research. The problem may be that a moral society does not exist,
rather than a lack of federal laws or federal police. We need no more
federal mandates to deal with difficult issues that for the most part
were made worse by previous government mandates.
2001 Ron Paul 68:27
If the problem is
that our society lacks moral standards and governments cant impose
moral standards, hardly will this effort to write more laws solve this
perplexing and intriguing question regarding the cloning of a human
being and stem cell research.
2001 Ron Paul 68:28
Neither option
offered today regarding cloning provides a satisfactory solution.
Unfortunately, the real issue is being ignored.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr073101.htm