2001 Ron Paul 67:2
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I
commend to the attention of members an editorial appearing in the Wall
Street Journal which is headlined In Praise of an Economic
Revolutionary. The column is authored by Mr. Bob McTeer, president
and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
2001 Ron Paul 67:3
In his article, Mr. McTeer
highlights the life of Frederic Bastiat, a member of the French Chamber
of Deputies during the 19th century who made great contributions to
both individual liberty and free markets with clear, simple and
humorous observations and arguments. Bastiat was a pioneer in the field
of economics who fought against the protectionist fallacies and
absurdities that persisted in his day and indeed continue to haunt us
today.
2001 Ron Paul 67:4
Bastiat understood well what
few in Congress have come to grasp--that it is absurd to favor
producers over consumers and sellers over buyers. This is because
producers and sellers benefit from scarcity and high prices while
consumers benefit from abundance and low prices. As a consequence, when
government policies favor producers, the citizens of the United States
are faced with scarcity and unnecessarily high prices. In essence, the
economic pie is made smaller for all.
2001 Ron Paul 67:5
As members of Congress we
should note, as Bastiat did, that because we have limited resources and
unlimited wants, it is unwise to create inefficiencies for the purpose
of creating or protecting jobs. As Mr. McTeer writes, Progress comes
from reducing the work needed to produce, not increasing it.
2001 Ron Paul 67:6
By supporting protectionist
policies that tend to create stagnation and hurt consumers, some
members stand in the way of economic progress that would benefit all.
Yet we should reject these policies and in the tradition of Bastiat do
away with the absurd notice that inefficiencies are good for this
country and its people.
2001 Ron Paul 67:7
Mr. Speaker, again I commend Mr.
McTeers column and encourage the recognition of the economic
revolutionary, Frederic Bastiat.
2001 Ron Paul 67:9
The state is the great fictitious entity by which
everyone
seeks to live at the expense of everyone
else,--Frédéric Bastiat
(1801-1850)
2001 Ron Paul 67:10
Claude Frédéric Bastiat was born in
Bayonne, in
the southwest of France, 200 years ago last Friday. This week, I kicked
off a conference in nearby Dax, France, celebrating Bastiats
contributions to individual liberty and free markets.
2001 Ron Paul 67:11
The whole world should be celebrating the birthday of
this pioneer of free-market capitalism.
2001 Ron Paul 67:12
Bastiats output was prodigious, especially in
the last five years of his life. Through his writing and speeches, and
as a member of the French Chamber of Deputies, Bastiat fought valiantly
against the protectionism and socialism of his time. He proselytized
for free trade, free markets and individual liberty. His weapons were
wit and satire; his method was the reductio ad absurdum. More than any
other person before or since, he exposed economic fallacies with a
clarity, simplicity and humor that left opponents with no place to
hide.
2001 Ron Paul 67:13
The most famous example of Bastiats satire was
his petition to the French parliament on behalf of candlemakers and
related industries. He was seeking relief from ruinous competition of
a foreign rival who works under conditions so far superior to our own
for the production of light that he is flooding the domestic market
with it at an incredibly low price. The foreign rival was the sun.
The relief sought was a law requiring the closing of all blinds to shut
out the sunlight and stimulate the domestic candle industry.
2001 Ron Paul 67:14
Despite the publication of Adam Smiths The
Wealth of Nations decades earlier, Bastiat was still fighting the
mercantilist view of exports as good and imports as bad. He pointed out
that under this view, the ideal situation would be for a ship loaded
with exports to sink at sea. One nation gets the benefit of exporting
and no nation has to bear the burden of importing.
2001 Ron Paul 67:15
Bastiat once saw an editorial proposing a
Bordeaux stop on the railroad from Paris to Spain to stimulate local
business. He wondered, why only Bordeaux? Why not have a stop in every
single town along the way--a never-ending series of breaks--so the
prosperity could be enjoyed by all? They could call it a negative
railroad.
2001 Ron Paul 67:16
This point is true even today. Trade with Mexico
has boomed since the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement
and so has truck traffic across the Rio Grande. Luckily we have bridges
to facilitate the crossing. But while the bridges were made for
crossing, the hundreds of warehouses near the border were not. Theyre
for storing and waiting--where Mexican truckers are required to hand
over their cargo to domestic carriers. Bastiat had his negative
railroads. We have negative bridges.
2001 Ron Paul 67:17
Then theres Bastiats broken-window fallacy. It
seems someone broke a window. Its unfortunate, but theres a silver
lining. Money spent to repair the window will being new business to the
repairman. He, in turn, will spend his higher income and generate more
business for others. The broken window could ultimately create a boom.
2001 Ron Paul 67:18
Wait a minute, Bastiat cautioned. Thats based
only on what is seen. You must also consider what is not seen--what
does not happen. What is not seen is how the money would have been
spent if the window had not been broken. The broken window didnt
increase spending; it diverted spending.
2001 Ron Paul 67:19
Obvious? Sure, but we fall for a version of the
broken-window fallacy every time we evaluate the impact of a government
program without considering what taxpayers would have done with the
money instead. Some people even judge monetary policy by what happens,
without considering what might have happened.
2001 Ron Paul 67:20
Most economic myths give way to Bastiats
distinction between the seen and the unseen. Related concepts include
half truths and whole truths, intended and unintended consequences, the
short run and long run and partial effects and total effects. Henry
Hazlitt expanded on these themes in his wonderful book, Economics in
One Lesson. If you dont have time to read Bastiats collected works,
try Hazlitts book.
2001 Ron Paul 67:21
Bastiat called attention to the absurdities
that come from favoring producers over consumers and sellers over
buyers. Producers benefit from scarcity and high prices while consumers
benefit from abundance and low prices. Government policies favoring
producers, therefore, tend to favor scarcity over abundance. They
shrink the pie.
2001 Ron Paul 67:22
Bastiat stressed that because we have limited
resources and unlimited wants, its foolish to contrive inefficiencies
just to create jobs. Progress comes from reducing the work needed to
produce, not increasing it. Yet, a day doesnt pass that we dont hear
of some proposal to create jobs, as if theres no work to be done
otherwise. If its jobs we want, lets just replace all the bulldozers
with shovels. If we want even more work, replace shovels with spoons.
Bastiat suggested working with only our left hands.
2001 Ron Paul 67:23
I was cautioned that most of the participants
in the Bastiat conference would probably be from other countries, since
Bastiats free-market views arent highly regarded in France. That
reminded me of my visit to Adam Smiths grave in Scotland a couple of
years ago. I went into a souvenir shop about a block away and asked
what kind of Adam Smith souvenirs they had. They not only didnt have
any, theyd never even had a request for one before. What a shame!
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr072601B.htm