Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Speaker, I
yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from
Texas (Mr. PAUL).
(Mr. PAUL asked and was given permission
to revise and extend his remarks.)
2006 Ron Paul 89:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this bill, and let
me give you a few reasons why.
2006 Ron Paul 89:2
In the introduction to the bill, it says that its purpose is to hold the current
regime in Iran accountable for its
threatening behavior and to support a
transition of its government; and I
would just ask one question: Could it
be possible that others around the
world and those in Iran see us as participating
in threatening behavior?
We should make an attempt to see
things from other peoples view as well.
2006 Ron Paul 89:3
I want to give you three quick reasons why I think we should not be
going at it this way:
2006 Ron Paul 89:4
First, this is a confrontational manner of dealing with a problem. A country
that is powerful and self-confident
should never need to resort to confrontation.
If one is confident, one
should be willing to use diplomacy
whether dealing with our friends or our
enemies; I think the lack of confidence
motivates resolutions of this type.
2006 Ron Paul 89:5
The second reason that I will give you for opposing this is that this is
clearly seeking regime change in Iran.
We are taking it upon ourselves that
we do not like the current regime. I
dont like Almadinyad, but do we have
the responsibility and the authority to
orchestrate regime change? We approach
this by doing two things: Sanctions
to penalize, at the same time giving
aid to those groups that we expect
to undermine the government. Do you
know if somebody came into this country
and paid groups to undermine our
government, that is illegal? Yet here
we are casually paying money, millions
of dollars, unlimited sums of money to
undermine that government. This is illegal.
2006 Ron Paul 89:6
The third point. This bill rejects the notion of the nonproliferation treaty.
The Iranians have never been proven to
be in violation of the nonproliferation
treaty; and this explicitly says that
they cannot enrich, uranium even for
private and commercial purposes.
2006 Ron Paul 89:7
For these three reasons we obviously should reconsider and not use this
confrontational approach. Why not try
diplomacy? Oppose this resolution.