Condemning The Recent Attacks Against The State Of Israel
19 July 2006
HON. RON PAUL
OF TEXAS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Wednesday, July 19, 2006
2006 Ron Paul 68:1
Mr. PAUL. Madam Speaker, I rise in opposition to this resolution, which I sincerely believe
will do more harm than good.
2006 Ron Paul 68:2
I do agree with the resolutions condemnation of violence. But I am convinced that when
we get involved in foreign conflicts and send
strong messages, such as this resolution will,
it ends up expanding the war rather than diminishing
the conflict, and that ultimately
comes back to haunt us.
2006 Ron Paul 68:3
Madam Speaker, I follow a policy in foreign affairs called non-interventionism. I do not believe
we are making the United States more
secure when we involve ourselves in conflicts
overseas. The Constitution really does not authorize
us to be the policemen of the world,
much less to favor one side over another in
foreign conflicts. It is very clear, reading this
resolution objectively, that all the terrorists are
on one side, and all the victims and the innocents
are on the other side. I find this unfair,
particularly considering the significantly higher
number of civilian casualties among Lebanese
civilians. I would rather advocate neutrality
rather than picking sides, which is what this
resolution does.
2006 Ron Paul 68:4
Some would say that there is no room to talk about neutrality, as if neutrality were a
crime. I would suggest there should be room
for an open mind to consider another type of
policy that may save American lives.
2006 Ron Paul 68:5
I was in Congress in the early 1980s when the U.S. Marines were sent into Lebanon, and
I came to the Floor before they went, when
they went, and before they were killed, arguing
my case against getting involved in that
conflict.
2006 Ron Paul 68:6
Ronald Reagan, when he sent the troops in, said he would never turn tail and run. Then,
after the Marines were killed, he had a reassessment
of the policy. When he wrote his
autobiography a few years later after leaving
the Presidency, he wrote this:
2006 Ron Paul 68:7
Perhaps we didnt appreciate fully enough
the depth of the hatred and the complexity
of the problems that made the Middle East
such a jungle. Perhaps the idea of a suicide
car bomber committing mass murder to gain
instant entry to Paradise was so foreign to
our own values and consciousness that it did
not create in us the concern for the marines
safety that it should have.
2006 Ron Paul 68:8
In the weeks immediately after the bombing, I believe the last thing that we should
do was turn tail and leave. Yet the irrationality
of Middle Eastern politics forced us to
rethink our policy there. If there would be
some rethinking of policy before our men
die, we would be a lot better off. If that policy
had changed towards more of a neutral
position and neutrality, those 241 marines
would be alive today.
2006 Ron Paul 68:9
It is very easy to criticize the Government of Lebanon for not doing more about Hezbollah.
I object to terrorism committed by Hezbollah
because I am a strong opponent to all violence
on all sides. But I also object to the unreasonable
accusations that the Government
of Lebanon has not done enough, when we
realize that Israel occupied southern Lebanon
for 18 years and was not able to neutralize
Hezbollah.
2006 Ron Paul 68:10
Madam Speaker, there is nothing wrong with considering the fact that we dont have to
be involved in every single fight. That was the
conclusion that Ronald Reagan came to, and
he was not an enemy of Israel. He was a
friend of Israel. But he concluded that that is
a mess over there. Let me just repeat those
words that he used. He said, he came to the
conclusion, The irrationality of Middle Eastern
politics forced us to rethink our policy there.
I believe these words are probably more valid
now even than when they were written.