2006 Ron Paul 56:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chairman, it is shameful that Americans were once routinely denied the
ability to vote on account of their skin color. All
Americans should celebrate the Voting Rights
Acts role in vindicating the constitutional rights
of all citizens to vote free of racial discrimination.
Therefore, I was hoping I could support
reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act. However,
I cannot support H.R. 9 because it extends
the unfunded bilingual ballots mandate.
2006 Ron Paul 56:2
I had joined with my colleague from Iowa, Mr. KING, in supporting an amendment to
strike the bilingual ballot mandate, which was
unfortunately rejected by this House. Mr.
Speaker, despite the fact that a person must
demonstrate a basic command of the English
language before becoming a citizen, Congress
is continuing to force States to provide ballots
in languages other than English. If a knowledge
of English is important enough to be a
precondition of citizenship, then why should
we force States to facilitate voting in languages
other than English?
2006 Ron Paul 56:3
Of course, Mr. Chairman, I have no desire to deny any American citizens the ability to
vote. Contrary to the claims of its opponents,
Mr. KINGs amendment does not deny any
American the ability to vote. Under Mr. KINGs
amendment, Americans will still have a legal
right to bring translators to the polls to assist
them in voting, and States could still choose to
print bilingual ballots if the King amendment
passes. All the King amendment did is repeal
a costly Federal mandate.
2006 Ron Paul 56:4
In conclusion, while I recognize the continuing need for protection of voting rights, I
cannot support this bill before us since it extends
the costly and divisive bilingual ballot
mandate.