Legislation To Withdraw The United States From The Bretton Woods Agreement
17 July 2003
HON. RON PAUL
OF TEXAS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Thursday, July 17, 2003
2003 Ron Paul 84:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce legislation to withdraw the United States from
the Bretton Woods Agreement and thus end
taxpayer support for the International Monetary
Fund (IMF). Rooted in a discredited economic
philosophy and a complete disregard
for fundamental constitutional principles, the
IMF forces American taxpayers to subsidize
large, multinational corporations and underwrite
economic destruction around the globe.
This is because the IMF often uses the $46.7
billion line of credit provided to it by the American
taxpayers to bribe countries to follow destructive,
statist policies.
2003 Ron Paul 84:2
Just last year, Argentina was rocked by an economic crisis caused by IMF policies. Despite
clear signs over the past several years
that the Argentine economy was in serious
trouble, the IMF continued pouring taxpayersubsidized
loans with an incredibly low interest
rate of 2.6 percent into the country. In 2001,
as Argentinas fiscal position steadily deteriorated,
the IMF funneled over 8 billion dollars to
the Argentine government!
2003 Ron Paul 84:3
According to Congressman JIM SAXTON, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee,
this Continued lending over many years sustained
and subsidized a bankrupt Argentine
economic policy, whose collapse is now all the
more serious. The IMFs generous subsidized
bailouts lead to moral hazard problems, and
enable shaky governments to pressure the
IMF for even more funding or risk disaster.
2003 Ron Paul 84:4
Argentina is just the latest example of the folly of IMF policies. Five years ago the world
economy was rocked by an IMF-created disaster
in Asia. The IMF regularly puts the taxpayer
on the hook for the mistakes of the big
banks. Oftentimes, Mr. Speaker, IMF funds
end up in the hands of corrupt dictators who
use our taxpayer-provided largesse to prop up
their regimes by rewarding their supporters
and depriving their opponents of access to
capital.
2003 Ron Paul 84:5
If not corrupt, most IMF borrowers are governments of countries with little economic productivity.
Either way, most recipient nations
end up with huge debts that they cannot service,
which only adds to their poverty and instability.
IMF money ultimately corrupts those
countries it purports to help, by keeping afloat
reckless political institutions that destroy their
own economies.
2003 Ron Paul 84:6
IMF policies ultimately are based on a flawed philosophy that says the best means of
creating economic prosperity is through government-
to-government transfers. Such programs
cannot produce growth, because they
take capital out of private hands, where it can
be allocated to its most productive use as determined
by the choices of consumers in the
market; and place it in the hands of politicians.
Placing economic resources in the hands of
politicians and bureaucrats inevitably results in
inefficiencies, shortages, and economic crises,
as even the best-intentioned politicians cannot
know the most efficient use of resources.
2003 Ron Paul 84:7
In addition, the IMF violates basic constitutional and moral principles. The Federal Government
has no constitutional authority to fund
international institutions such as the IMF. Furthermore,
Mr. Speaker, it is simply immoral to
take money from hard-working Americans to
support the economic schemes of politicallypowerful
special interests and third-world dictators.
2003 Ron Paul 84:8
In all my years in Congress, I have never been approached by a taxpayer asking that he
or she be forced to provide more subsidies to
Wall Street executives and foreign dictators.
The only constituency for the IMF is the huge
multinational banks and corporations. Big
banks used IMF funds — taxpayer funds — to
bail themselves out from billions in losses after
the Asian financial crisis. Big corporations obtain
lucrative contracts for a wide variety of
construction projects funded with IMF loans.
Its a familiar game in Washington, with corporate
welfare disguised as compassion for
the poor.
2003 Ron Paul 84:9
Last years Argentine debacle is yet further proof that the IMF was a bad idea from the
very beginning — economically, constitutionally,
and morally. The IMF is a relic of an era when
power-hungry bureaucrats and deluded economists
believed they could micromanage the
worlds economy. Withdrawal from the IMF
would benefit American taxpayers, as well as
workers and consumers around the globe. I
hope my colleagues will join me in working to
protect the American taxpayer from underwriting
the destruction of countries like Argentina,
by cosponsoring my legislation to end
Americas support for the IMF.