2003 Ron Paul 104:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, the American dream, as conceived by the Nations Founders,
has little in common with H.R. 1276, the
so-called American Dream Downpayment Act.
In the original version of the American dream,
individuals earned the money to purchase a
house through their own efforts, often times
sacrificing other goods to save for their first
downpayment. According to the sponsors of
H.R. 1276, that old American dream has been
replaced by a new dream of having the Federal
Government force your fellow citizens to
hand you the money for a downpayment.
2003 Ron Paul 104:2
H.R. 1276 not only warps the true meaning of the American dream, but also exceeds Congress
constitutional boundaries and interferes
with and distorts the operation of the free market.
Instead of expanding unconstitutional federal
power, Congress should focus its energies
on dismantling the federal housing bureaucracy
so the American people can control
housing resources and use the free market to
meet their demands for affordable housing.
2003 Ron Paul 104:3
As the great economist Ludwig Von Mises pointed out, questions of the proper allocation
of resources for housing and other goods
should be determined by consumer preference
in the free market. Resources removed from
the market and distributed according to the
preferences of government politician and bureaucrats
are not devoted to their highest-valued
use. Thus, government interference in the
economy results in a loss of economic efficiency
and, more importantly, a lower standard
of living for all citizens.
2003 Ron Paul 104:4
H.R. 1276 takes resources away from private citizens, through confiscatory taxation,
and uses them for the politically favored cause
of expanding home ownership. Government
subsidization of housing leads to an excessive
allocation of resources to the housing market.
Thus, thanks to government policy, resources
that would have been devoted to education,
transportation, or some other good desired by
consumers, will instead be devoted to housing.
Proponents of this bill ignore the socially
beneficial uses the monies devoted to housing
might have been put to had those resources
been left in the hands of private citizens.
2003 Ron Paul 104:5
Finally, while I know this argument is unlikely to have much effect on my colleagues,
I must point out that Congress has no constitutional
authority to take money from one
American and redistribute it to another. Legislation
such as H.R. 1276, which takes tax
money from some Americans to give to others
whom Congress has determined are worthy, is
thus blatantly unconstitutional.
2003 Ron Paul 104:6
I hope no one confuses my opposition to this bill as opposition to any congressional actions
to ensure more Americans have access
to affordable housing. After all, one reason
many Americans lack affordable housing is
because taxes and regulations have made it
impossible for builders to provide housing at a
price that could be afforded by many lower-income
Americans. Therefore, Congress should
cut taxes and regulations. A good start would
be generous housing tax credits. Congress
should also consider tax credits and regulatory
relief for developers who provide housing for
those with low incomes. For example, I am cosponsoring
H.R. 839, the Renewing the
Dream Tax Credit Act, which provides a tax
credit to developers who construct or rehabilitate
low-income housing.
2003 Ron Paul 104:7
H.R. 1276 distorts the economy and violates constitutional prohibitions on income redistribution.
A better way of guaranteeing an efficient
housing market where everyone could
meet their own needs for housing would be for
Congress to repeal taxes and programs that
burden the housing industry and allow housing
needs to be met by the free market. Therefore,
I urge my colleagues to reject this bill
and instead develop housing policies consistent
with constitutional principles, the laws
of economics, and respect for individual rights.