2002 Ron Paul 32:1
MR. PAUL: Mr. Speaker, this legislation could not
have come at
a worse time in the ongoing Middle East crisis. Just when we have seen
some
positive signs that the two sides may return to negotiations toward a
peaceful
settlement, Congress has jumped into the fray on one side of the
conflict. I do
not believe that this body wishes to de-rail the slight progress that
seems to
have come from the Administration’s more even-handed approach over the
past
several days. So why is it that we are here today ready to pass
legislation that
clearly and openly favors one side in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
2002 Ron Paul 32:2
There are many troubling aspects to this legislation.
The
legislation says that "the number of Israelis killed during that time
[since September 2000] by suicide terrorist attacks alone, on a basis
proportional to the United States population, is approximately 9,000,
three
times the number killed in the terrorist attacks on New York and
Washington on
September 11, 2001." This kind of numbers game with the innocent dead
strikes me as terribly disrespectful and completely unhelpful.
2002 Ron Paul 32:3
It is, when speaking of the dead, the one-sidedness
of this
bill that is so unfortunate. How is it that the side that loses seven
people to
every one on the other side is portrayed as the sole aggressor and
condemned as
terrorist? This is only made worse by the fact that Palestinian deaths
are seen
in the Arab world as being American-inspired, as it is our weapons that
are
being used against them. This bill just reinforces negative perceptions
of the
United States in that part of the world. What might be the consequences
of this?
I think we need to stop and think about that for a while. We in this
body have a
Constitutional responsibility to protect the national security of the
United
States. This one-sided intervention in a far-off war has the potential
to do
great harm to our national security.
2002 Ron Paul 32:4
Perhaps this is why the Administration views this
legislation
as "not a very helpful approach" to the situation in the Middle East.
In my view, it is bad enough that we are intervening at all in this
conflict,
but this legislation strips any lingering notion that the United States
intends
to be an honest broker. It states clearly that the leadership of one
side - the
Palestinians - is bad and supports terrorism just at a time when this
Administration negotiates with both sides in an attempt to bring peace
to the
region. Talk about undermining the difficult efforts of the president
and the
State Department. What incentive does Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat
or his
organization have to return to the negotiating table if we as "honest
broker" make it clear that in Congress’s eyes, the Palestinians are
illegitimate terrorists? Must we become so involved in this far-off
conflict
that we are forced to choose between Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel
Sharon? The United States Congress should not, Constitutionally, be in
the
business of choosing who gets to lead which foreign people.
2002 Ron Paul 32:5
Many people of various religious backgrounds seem
determined
to portray what is happening in the Middle East as some kind of
historic/religious struggle, where one side is pre-ordained to triumph
and
destroy the other. Even some in this body have embraced this notion.
Surely the
religious component that some interject into the conflict rouses
emotions and
adds fuel to the fire. But this is dangerous thinking. Far from a great
holy
war, the Middle East conflict is largely about what most wars are
about: a
struggle for land and resources in a part of the world where both are
scarce. We
must think and act rationally, with this fact clearly in mind.
2002 Ron Paul 32:6
Just as with our interventionism in other similar
struggles
around the world, our meddling in the Middle East has unforeseen
consequences.
Our favoritism of one side has led to the hatred of America and
Americans by the
other side. We are placing our country in harm’s way with this
approach. It is
time to step back and look at our policy in the Middle East. After 24
years of
the "peace process" and some 300 billion of our dollars, we are
no closer to peace than when President Carter concluded the Camp David
talks.
2002 Ron Paul 32:7
Mr. Speaker, any other policy that had so utterly
failed over
such a long period of time would likely come under close scrutiny here.
Why is
it that when it comes to interventionism in the Middle East conflict we
continue
down this unproductive and very expensive road?
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr050202.htm