2002 Ron Paul 101:1
Mr. Speaker, when the
process of
creating a Department of Homeland Security commenced, Congress was led
to
believe that the legislation would be a simple reorganization aimed at
increasing efficiency, not an attempt to expand federal power. Fiscally
conservative members of Congress were even told that the bill would be
budget
neutral! Yet, when the House of Representatives initially considered
creating a
Department of Homeland Security, the legislative vehicle almost
overnight grew
from 32 pages to 282 pages- and the cost had ballooned to at least $3
billion.
Now we are prepared to vote on a nearly 500-page bill that increases
federal
expenditures and raises troubling civil liberties questions. Adding
insult to
injury, this bill was put together late last night and introduced only
this
morning. Worst of all, the text of the bill has not been made readily
available
to most members, meaning this Congress is prepared to create a massive
new
federal agency without even knowing the details. This is a dangerous
and
irresponsible practice.
2002 Ron Paul 101:2
The last time Congress
attempted a
similarly ambitious reorganization of the government was with the
creation of
the Department of Defense in 1947. However, the process by which we are
creating
this new department bears little resemblance to the process by which
the Defense
Department was created. Congress began hearings on the proposed
Department of Defense in 1945 – two years before President Truman signed legislation
creating the new Department into law! Despite the lengthy deliberative process
through which Congress created that new department, turf battles and logistical
problems continued to bedevil the military establishment, requiring several
corrective pieces of legislation. In fact, Mr. Speaker, the Goldwater-Nicholas
Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986 was passed to deal with
problems steaming from the 1947 law! The experience with the Department of
Defense certainly suggests the importance of a more deliberative process in the
creation of this new agency.
2002 Ron Paul 101:3
HR 5710 grants major new
powers to the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) by granting HHS the
authority to
"administer" the smallpox vaccine to members of the public if the
Department unilaterally determines that there is a public health threat
posed by
smallpox. HHS would not even have to demonstrate an actual threat of a
smallpox
attack, merely the "potential" of an attack. Thus, this bill grants
federal agents the authority to force millions of Americans to be
injected with
a potentially lethal vaccine based on nothing more than a theoretical
potential
smallpox incident. Furthermore, this provision continues to restrict
access to
the smallpox vaccine from those who have made a voluntary choice to
accept the
risk of the vaccine in order to protect themselves from smallpox. It is
hard to
think of a more blatant violation of liberty than allowing government
officials
to force people to receive potentially dangerous vaccines based on
hypothetical risks.
2002 Ron Paul 101:4
While this provision appears
to be based on similar provisions granting broad mandatory vaccination and
quarantine powers to governors from the controversial "Model Health Emergency
Powers Act," this provision has not been considered by the House. Instead,
this provision seems to have been snuck into the bill at the last minute. At
the very least, Mr. Speaker, before Congress grants HHS such sweeping powers, we
should have an open debate instead of burying the authorization in a couple of
paragraphs tucked away in a 484 page bill!
2002 Ron Paul 101:5
HR 5710 also expands the
federal police
state by allowing the attorney general to authorize federal agency
inspectors
general and their agents to carry firearms and make warrantless
arrests. One of
the most disturbing trends in recent years is the increase in the
number of
federal officials authorized to carry guns. This is especially
disturbing when
combined with the increasing trend toward restricting the ability of
average
Americans to exercise their second amendment rights. Arming the
government while
disarming the public encourages abuses of power.
2002 Ron Paul 101:6
Mr. Speaker, HR 5710 gives
the federal
government new powers and increases federal expenditures, completely
contradicting what members were told about the bill. Furthermore, these
new power grabs are being rushed through Congress without giving members
the ability to debate, or even properly study, this proposal. I must oppose this
bill and urge my colleagues to do the same.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr111302.htm