2001 Ron Paul 94:1
Mr. Speaker, today I am introducing
the Securing America For Effective Transportation, or Safety, Act. This
legislation is in stark contrast to the bureaucracy laden approaches of
other bills. My bill would not create new federal spending nor new
federal bureaucracies. The actions taken by this legislation fit into a
few broad categories. First, it would give airline pilots the right to
defend themselves, their aircraft, and their passengers by permitting
them to bear arms. Second, it would clearly define the act of
skyjacking as an act of piracy and provide appropriate punishment for
any such act, up to and including capital punishment. Next, this
legislation would provide appropriate strengthening of regulation of
airline security in a fashion consistent with our constitutional
framework. This would be done by requiring, for example, that law
enforcement personnel be posted at screening locations rather than
simply in the confines of an airport, and by requiring the production
of passenger manifests for international flights. Finally, this bill
would give airlines a strong incentive to improve passenger security,
not by giving them taxpayer funded grants nor by creating new
bureaucracies tasked with making administrative law, but rather by
providing a tax incentive to airlines and other companies performing
screening and security duties.
2001 Ron Paul 94:2
One example of my approach is how it
treats employees. Rather than the Senate approach federalizing the work
force or the House approach of subsidizing private security firms via
federal contracts, my bill raises the take-home pay of airline security
personnel by exempting their pay from federal income taxes.
2001 Ron Paul 94:3
Mr. Speaker, the House bill, while a
slight improvement over the Senate version, is still a step in the
wrong direction. By authorizing a new airline ticket tax, by creating
new federal mandates and bureaucracies, and by subsidizing the airline
industry to the tune of another $3 billion dollars, this bill creates a
costly expense that the American people cannot afford. We appropriated
$40 billion dollars in the wake of September 11, and I supported that
measure as legitimate compensation for individuals and companies harmed
by the failure of the federal government to provide national defense.
Soon thereafter we made another $15 billion available to the airlines,
and now we have a House bill that further victimizes the taxpayers by
making them pay for another $3 billion dollars worth of subsidies to
the airline industry.
2001 Ron Paul 94:4
We need to stop this spending spree.
President Bush correctly has indicated that the best way to deal with
economic stimulus is not to spend more federal dollars but rather to
engage in tax cuts. Yet, by creating this new airline ticket tax, we
are going in the opposite direction. I oppose this new tax and it is
not included in my bill. Instead, the approach taken in my
bill uses tax reductions to ensure airline safety and promote further
economic growth. By granting tax incentives for safety initiatives, we
gain the advantages of new security precautions without creating
onerous new regulations or costly and burdensome new bureaucracies. I
proudly offer this bill for consideration.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr110101.htm