2009 Ron Paul 72:1
Mr. PAUL. Madam Speaker, I rise in reluctant
opposition to H. Res 560, which condemns
the Iranian government for its recent
actions during the unrest in that country. While
I never condone violence, much less the violence
that governments are only too willing to
mete out to their own citizens, I am always
very cautious about condemning the actions
of governments overseas. As an elected member
of the United States House of Representatives,
I have always questioned our constitutional
authority to sit in judgment of the actions
of foreign governments of which we are not
representatives. I have always hesitated when
my colleagues rush to pronounce final judgment
on events thousands of miles away
about which we know very little. And we know
very little beyond limited press reports about
what is happening in Iran.
2009 Ron Paul 72:2
Of course I do not support attempts by foreign
governments to suppress the democratic
aspirations of their people, but when is the last
time we condemned Saudi Arabia or Egypt or
the many other countries where unlike in Iran
there is no opportunity to exercise any substantial
vote on political leadership? It seems
our criticism is selective and applied when
there are political points to be made. I have
admired President Obamas cautious approach
to the situation in Iran and I would
have preferred that we in the House had acted
similarly.
2009 Ron Paul 72:3
I adhere to the foreign policy of our Founders,
who advised that we not interfere in the
internal affairs of countries overseas. I believe
that is the best policy for the United States, for
our national security and for our prosperity. I
urge my colleagues to reject this and all similar
meddling resolutions.
2009 Ron Paul 72:4
Madam Speaker, I urge you to support H.R.
560, expressing support for all Iranian citizens
who embrace the values of freedom, human
rights, civil liberties, and rule of law and for
other purposes. The only effective way to
achieve lasting peace and prosperity in the region,
along with bringing about reforms in
Irans polity, is to assist the Iranian people in
their quest to achieve political, social, and religious
liberty. Every government can be judged
with the way in which it treats its ethnic and
religious minorities, and the current Iranian
government gets a failing grade for its treatment
of its many and diverse minorities. It is
not our position as the United States to determine
the outcome of the recent Iranian elections,
but as a leader in the international community,
we have a responsibility to ensure that
the people of Iran have the opportunity to
have fair and free elections.
2009 Ron Paul 72:5
Yet with the results of the recent election,
there was no chance for Iranian citizens to
participate in democracy. On June 12, 2009
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was ostensibly re-
elected to his second term as President, as a
result of the tenth Presidential elections in
Iran, held and calculated on June 13, 2009.
Subject to official results released by Irans
election headquarters, out of a total of
39,165,191 ballots cast in the presidential
election, Ahmadinejad allegedly won
24,527,516 votes, which accounts for approximately
62.6 percent of the votes, while his opponent
and former Prime Minister of Iran Mir-
Hossein Mousavi purportedly secured only
13,216,411 (37.4 percent) of the votes. Supreme
Leader Ali Khamenei announced that
he envisions Ahmadinejad as president in the
next five years, a comment interpreted as indicating
support for Ahmadinejads reelection.
2009 Ron Paul 72:6
Just 48 hours after Iranian officials announced
incumbent President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejads landslide 62.6% victory, the situation
in Tehran and in regions throughout the
country broke out in a wave of violent protests
in response to what the people of Iran knew
to be a rigged poll.
2009 Ron Paul 72:7
Yet despite the large-scale civil unrest in response
to the rigged elections, the outstretched
arm of the Ayatollah extends beyond
Tehran. Whereas the size of the crowds protesting
reached to more than 1 million people
united in outrage at the absence of a fair and
free electoral process. Despite the government
ban that has been placed on all public gatherings
with the purpose of voicing opposition
to the outcome of the Iranian presidential elections,
the people of Iran have publicly expressed
their dissent. Iranians throughout the
country have defied Interior Ministry warnings
broadcast. Violence has spilled on to the
streets of Tehran. To date, 7 Iranians have
been killed in violent political unrest. Beyond
Tehran, Iranians living in the rural regions are
feeling the Ayatollahs pressures to cease all
public expression of their discontent with the
outcome of the elections. The Iranian people
living in the region of Mashad are currently
confined to their homes in order to prevent
them protesting in the streets. All foreign journalists
have now been quarantined and/or
made to leave the country.
2009 Ron Paul 72:8
Following the results of the June l2th Iranian
election, President Obama released a statement
in reaction to then elections in Iran, stating
I am deeply troubled by the violence that
Ive been seeing on television, Obama said in
Washington. I cant state definitively one way
or another what happened with respect to the
election. But what I can say is that there appears
to be a sense on the part of people who
were so hopeful and so engaged and so committed
to democracy who now feel betrayed.
2009 Ron Paul 72:9
Given the absence of fair and free elections,
coupled with the governments poor record for
transparency and accountability, we have
deep cause for concern about the opportunity
for free choices and democratic participation
for the people of Iran. Despite intensified inspections
since 2002, the International Atomic
Energy Agencys (IAEA) inability, to verify that
Irans nuclear program is not designed to develop
a nuclear weapon is cause for great
concern. While Iran states that the intention of
its nuclear program is for electricity generation
which it feels is vital to its energy security,
U.S. officials challenge this justification by
stating that Irans vast gas resources make a
nuclear energy program unnecessary.
2009 Ron Paul 72:10
Establishing a diplomatic dialogue with the
Government of Iran and deepening relationships
with the Iranian people will only help foster
greater understanding between the people
of Iran and the people of the United States
and would enhance the stability the security of
the Persian Gulf region. Furthering President
Obamas approach toward continued engagement
will reduce the increased threat of the
proliferation or use of nuclear weapons in the
region, while advancing other U.S. foreign policy
objectives in the region. The significance of
establishing and sustaining diplomatic relations
with Iran cannot be over-emphasized.
Avoidance and military intervention cannot be
the means through which we resolve this
looming crisis.
2009 Ron Paul 72:11
In conclusion, we must condemn Iran for the
absence of fair and free Presidential elections
and urge Iran to provide its people with the
opportunity to engage in a Democratic election
process, by demanding new elections, and ensure
that all votes are fairly counted. I look forward
to further meaningful discussion and a
new foreign policy strategy with regard to Iran
when the people of Iran are able to participate
in a fair and democratic electoral process.