COMMEMORATING 20TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE TIANANMEN SQUARE SUPPRESSION
SPEECH OF
HON. RON PAUL
OF TEXAS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
2009 Ron Paul 61:1
Mr. PAUL. Madam Speaker, I rise to oppose
this unnecessary and counter-productive resolution
regarding the 20th anniversary of the incident
in Chinas Tiananmen Square. In addition
to my concerns over the content of this
legislation, I strongly object to the manner in
which it was brought to the floor for a vote.
While the resolution was being debated on the
House floor, I instructed my staff to obtain a
copy so that I could read it before the vote.
My staff was told by no less than four relevant
bodies within the House of Representatives
that the text was not available for review and
would not be available for another 24 hours. It
is unacceptable for Members of the House of
Representatives to be asked to vote on legislation
that is not available for them to read!
2009 Ron Paul 61:2
As to the substance of the resolution, I find
it disturbing that the House is going out of its
way to meddle in Chinas domestic politics,
which is none of our business, while ignoring
the many pressing issues in our own country
that definitely are our business.
2009 Ron Paul 61:3
This resolution calls on the Peoples Republic
of China to invite full and independent
investigations into the Tiananmen Square
crackdown, assisted by the United Nations
High Commissioner for Human Rights and the
International Committee of the Red Cross
. . . Where do we get the authority for such
a demand? I wonder how the U.S. government
would respond if China demanded that
the United Nations conduct a full and independent
investigation into the treatment of detainees
at the U.S.-operated Guantanamo facility?
2009 Ron Paul 61:4
The resolution calls on the legal authorities
of Peoples Republic of China to review immediately
the cases of those still imprisoned for
participating in the 1989 protests for compliance
with internationally recognized standards
of fairness and due process in judicial proceedings.
In light of U.S. governments extraordinary
renditions of possibly hundreds of
individuals into numerous secret prisons
abroad where they are held indefinitely without
charge or trial, one wonders what the rest of
the world makes of such U.S. demands. It is
hard to exercise credible moral authority in the
world when our motto toward foreign governments
seems to be do as we say, not as we
do.
2009 Ron Paul 61:5
While we certainly do not condone government
suppression of individual rights and liberties
wherever they may occur, why are we
not investigating these abuses closer to home
and within our jurisdiction? It seems the
House is not interested in investigating allegations
that U.S. government officials and employees
approved and practiced torture
against detainees. Where is the Congressional
investigation of the U.S.-operated secret prisons
overseas? What about the administrations
assertion of the right to detain individuals
indefinitely without trial? It may be easier
to point out the abuses and shortcomings of
governments overseas than to address government
abuses here at home, but we have
the constitutional obligation to exercise our
oversight authority in such matters. I strongly
believe that addressing these current issues
would be a better use of our time than once
again condemning China for an event that
took place some 20 years ago.