10 July 2008
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a
previous order of the House, the gentleman
from Texas (Mr. PAUL) is recognized
for 5 minutes.
2008 Ron Paul 43:1
Mr. PAUL. A couple of weeks ago, there was a resolution introduced in
the Congress, H. Con. Res. 362, that
quickly got 220 cosponsors. I want to
talk a little bit more about that resolution
because there are some Members
of Congress now having second
thoughts about invoking a blockade on
Iran.
2008 Ron Paul 43:2
Take, for instance, heres a quote from Congressman ROBERT WEXLER of
Florida. He says,
Given my growing
concerns regarding this resolution, including
its failure to advocate for direct
American engagement with
Tehran and open language that could
lead to a U.S. blockade of Iran, I will
lead an effort to make changes to this
resolution before it comes to the Foreign
Affairs Committee for a vote.
2008 Ron Paul 43:3
The chairman of the Financial Services Committee, BARNEY FRANK, had
this to say:
I am all for stricter sanctions
against Iran, but the blockade
part goes too far. I am going to call the
sponsors and tell them I am changing
my vote.
2008 Ron Paul 43:4
I would like all Members of Congress to reconsider, because this I consider a
very dangerous sense of congress resolution
and that it is going to lead to
trouble.
2008 Ron Paul 43:5
There is a new pro-Israeli lobby established called J Street, and they had
some comments about this legislation
as well. Their comments are this:
We
as a group oppose preemptive military
action by either the United States or
Israel and we support stronger U.S. diplomacy.
To us, it is common sense
that saber rattling and constant
threats are counterproductive. What
better way to unite Iran behind its
most hawkish leaders than threatening
to attack? What better way to empower
the Iranian hardliners case for
nuclear weapons development than to
talk of a military attack?
2008 Ron Paul 43:6
Today, I had three young Iranians in my office, and they verified that next
year there will be an election and
Ahmadinejad, who is in political trouble
over there, is being enhanced by
our militant conversation we have
here, threatening of blockades, and
with this plan or possible plan to actually
bomb Iran. But the other side argues,
well, no it is all the Iranians
fault. They are testing missiles.
2008 Ron Paul 43:7
The testing of missiles came after there were war games by Israel testing
whether or not they had the manpower
and the airplanes to travel that particular
distance. So the saber rattling
is not one-sided, and we cannot say
that it is all the Iranians fault.
2008 Ron Paul 43:8
This H. Con. Res. 362, the authors claim it is not a blockade. But what it
does, it demands inspection of all imports
of petroleum products, vehicles,
ships, planes, trains and cargo. They
use word prohibit and impose stringent
inspection on all of these items.
2008 Ron Paul 43:9
Now, the question I would like to pose here for our Members is this: How
would we as Americans and how would
we as a government react if a strong
government came and did that to us?
What if another government came and
said we are going to restrict the importation
of petroleum products and we
are going to inspect all vehicles, ships,
planes, trains and cargo? We wouldnt
know what that would mean. How
could they do that without an embargo?
This is militant language, it is just
looking for trouble, and it will not help
solve the situation.
2008 Ron Paul 43:10
There is nothing wrong with talking to people. We talked to the Soviets in
the midst of the Cold War. They had
40,000 nuclear weapons. Now they are
talking about, well, maybe the Iranians
might get a weapon later on.
2008 Ron Paul 43:11
Quite frankly, this talk about this violation, the Iranians were asked by
IAEA not to resume enrichment. They
had voluntarily stopped enrichment for
peaceful purposes. They have every
right under the Nonproliferation Treaty
to enrich for peaceful purposes. In
the last year, there have been nine unannounced
inspections of the Iranian
nuclear sites. They have never once
been found in violation.
2008 Ron Paul 43:12
This does not make them angels. This does not make them not want to
desire to defend their country. But
think about it: How many countries
have nukes around them? Pakistan has
nukes, India has them, Israel has them,
the United States has them, China has
them, the Soviets have them. And they
are being threatened. War games are
being practiced, with the potentiality
of us being a participant in bombing
them.
2008 Ron Paul 43:13
Madam Speaker, it is time for us to take a deep breath and reassess our position.