2008 Ron Paul 4:2
I rise to speak on the concept of competing currencies. Currency, or money, is what allows civilization to flourish.
In the absence of money, barter is the name of the game; if the
farmer needs shoes, he must trade his eggs and milk to the cobbler and hope
that the cobbler needs eggs and milk. Money makes the transaction process far easier.
Rather than having to search for someone with reciprocal wants, the farmer can
exchange his milk and eggs for an agreed-upon medium of exchange with which he
can then purchase shoes.
2008 Ron Paul 4:3
This medium of exchange should satisfy certain properties: it should be durable, that is to say, it does not wear out
easily; it should be portable, that is, easily carried; it should be divisible
into units usable for every-day transactions; it should be recognizable and
uniform, so that one unit of money has the same properties as every other unit; it
should be scarce, in the economic sense, so that the extant supply does not
satisfy the wants of everyone demanding it; it should be stable, so that the value
of its purchasing power does not fluctuate wildly; and it should be
reproducible, so that enough units of money can be created to satisfy the needs of
exchange.
2008 Ron Paul 4:4
Over millennia of human history, gold and silver have been the two metals that have most often satisfied these conditions,
survived the market process, and gained the trust of billions of people.
Gold and silver are difficult to counterfeit, a property which
ensures they will always be accepted in commerce.
It is precisely for this reason that gold and silver are anathema to
governments. A supply of gold and silver that is limited in supply by nature
cannot be inflated, and thus serves as a check on the growth of government.
Without the ability to inflate the currency, governments find
themselves constrained in their actions, unable to carry on wars of aggression or
to appease their overtaxed citizens with bread and circuses.
2008 Ron Paul 4:5
At this countrys founding, there was no government controlled national currency.
While the Constitution established the Congressional power of minting coins,
it was not until 1792 that the US Mint was formally established.
In the meantime, Americans made do with foreign silver and gold
coins. Even after the Mints operations got underway, foreign coins
continued to circulate within the United States, and did so for several decades.
2008 Ron Paul 4:6
On the desk in my office I have a sign that says: “Dont steal – the government hates competition.”
Indeed, any power a government arrogates to itself, it is loathe
to give back to the people. Just as we have
gone from a constitutionally-instituted national defense consisting of
a limited army and navy bolstered by militias and letters of marque and reprisal,
we have moved from a system of competing currencies to a government-instituted
banking cartel that monopolizes the issuance of currency.
In order to introduce a system of competing currencies, there
are three steps that must be taken to produce a legal climate favorable to
competition.
2008 Ron Paul 4:7
The first step consists of eliminating legal tender laws. Article I Section 10 of the Constitution forbids the States from
making anything but gold and silver a legal tender in payment of debts.
States are not required to enact legal tender laws, but should
they choose to, the only acceptable legal tender is gold and silver, the two
precious metals that individuals throughout history and across cultures have
used as currency. However, there is nothing
in the Constitution that grants the Congress the power to enact legal
tender laws. We, the Congress, have the power to coin money, regulate
the value thereof, and of foreign coin, but not to declare a legal tender.
Yet, there is a section of US Code, 31 USC 5103, that purports to establish US
coins and currency, including Federal Reserve notes, as legal tender.
2008 Ron Paul 4:8
Historically, legal tender laws have been used by governments to force their citizens to accept debased and devalued
currency. Greshams Law describes this phenomenon, which can be summed up
in one phrase:
bad money drives out good money. An emperor, a king, or a
dictator might mint coins with half an ounce of gold and force
merchants, under pain of death, to accept them as though they contained one ounce of
gold. Each ounce of the kings gold could now be minted into two coins
instead of one, so the king now had twice as much “money” to spend on building
castles and raising armies. As these
legally overvalued coins circulated, the coins containing the full
ounce of gold would be pulled out of circulation and hoarded.
We saw this same phenomenon happen in the mid-1960s when the US
government began to mint subsidiary coinage out of copper and nickel
rather than silver. The copper and nickel coins
were legally overvalued, the silver coins undervalued in relation, and
silver coins vanished from circulation.
2008 Ron Paul 4:9
These actions also give rise to the most pernicious effects of inflation. Most of the merchants
and peasants who received this devalued currency felt the full effects
of inflation, the rise in prices and the lowered standard of living,
before they received any of the new currency. By
the time they received the new currency, prices had long since doubled,
and the new currency they received would give them no benefit.
2008 Ron Paul 4:10
In the absence of legal tender laws, Greshams Law no longer holds. If people are free to reject debased currency, and instead
demand sound money, sound money will gradually return to use in society.
Merchants would have been free to reject the kings coin and accept only coins
containing full metal weight.
2008 Ron Paul 4:11
The second step to reestablishing competing currencies is to eliminate laws that prohibit the operation of private mints.
One private enterprise which attempted to popularize the use of
precious metal coins was Liberty Services, the creators of the Liberty Dollar.
Evidently the government felt threatened, as Liberty Dollars had
all their precious metal coins seized by the FBI and Secret Service this
past November. Of course, not all of these coins were owned by
Liberty Services, as many were held in trust as
backing for silver and gold certificates which Liberty Services issued.
None of this matters, of course, to the government, who hates to
see any competition.
2008 Ron Paul 4:12
The sections of US Code which Liberty Services is accused of violating are erroneously considered to be anti-counterfeiting
statutes, when in fact their purpose was to shut down private mints that had been
operating in California. California was awash in gold in the aftermath of
the 1849 gold rush, yet had no US Mint to mint coinage.
There was not enough foreign coinage circulating in California
either, so private mints stepped into the breech to provide their own coins.
As was to become the case in other industries during the
Progressive era, the private mints were eventually accused of circulating debased
(substandard) coinage, and in the interest of providing government-sanctioned
regulation and a government guarantee of purity, the 1864 Coinage Act was passed, which
banned private mints from producing their own coins for circulation as
currency.
2008 Ron Paul 4:13
The final step to ensuring competing currencies is to eliminate capital gains and sales taxes on gold and silver coins.
Under current federal law, coins are considered collectibles,
and are liable for capital gains taxes. Short-term
capital gains rates are at income tax levels, up to 35 percent, while
long-term capital gains taxes are assessed at the collectibles rate of 28 percent.
Furthermore, these taxes actually tax monetary debasement.
As the dollar weakens, the nominal dollar value of gold
increases. The purchasing power of gold may remain relatively constant, but
as the nominal dollar value increases, the federal government considers this
an increase in wealth, and taxes accordingly.
Thus, the more the dollar is debased, the more capital gains taxes must be
paid on holdings of gold and other precious metals.
2008 Ron Paul 4:14
Just as pernicious are the sales and use taxes which are assessed on gold and silver at the state level in many states.
Imagine having to pay sales tax at the bank every time you
change a $10 bill for a roll of quarters to do laundry.
Inflation is a pernicious tax on the value of money, but even the official
numbers, which are massaged downwards, are only on the order of 4% per year.
Sales taxes in many states can take away 8% or more on every
single transaction in which consumers wish to convert their Federal Reserve
Notes into gold or silver.
2008 Ron Paul 4:15
In conclusion, Madam Speaker, allowing for competing currencies will allow market participants to choose a currency that
suits their needs, rather than the needs of the government.
The prospect of American citizens turning away from the dollar
towards alternate currencies will provide the necessary impetus to the US
government to regain control of the dollar and halt its downward spiral.
Restoring soundness to the dollar will remove the governments
ability and incentive to inflate the currency, and keep us from launching
unconstitutional wars that burden our economy to excess.
With a sound currency, everyone is better off, not just those
who control the monetary system. I urge my
colleagues to consider the redevelopment of a system of competing currencies.