2008 Ron Paul 38:1
Madam Speaker, I regret that due to the unexpected last-minute appearance of
this measure on the legislative calendar this week, a prior commitment has
prevented me from voting on the FISA amendments. I have strongly opposed every
previous FISA overhaul attempt and I certainly would have voted against this one
as well.
2008 Ron Paul 38:2
The main reason I oppose this latest version is that it still clearly violates the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution by allowing the federal government
to engage in the bulk collection of American citizens’ communications
without a search warrant. That US citizens can have their private communication
intercepted by the government without a search warrant is
anti-American, deeply disturbing, and completely unacceptable.
2008 Ron Paul 38:3
In addition to gutting the fourth amendment, this measure will deprive Americans who have had their rights violated by telecommunication companies
involved in the Administration’s illegal wiretapping program the right to seek
redress in the courts for the wrongs committed against them. Worse, this measure
provides for retroactive immunity, whereby individuals or organizations that
broke the law as it existed are granted immunity for prior illegal actions once
the law has been changed. Ex post facto laws have long been considered anathema
in free societies under rule of law. Our Founding Fathers recognized this,
including in Article I section 9 of the Constitution that “No bill of attainder or
ex post facto Law shall be passed.” How is this FISA bill not a variation of ex
post facto? That alone should give pause to supporters of this measure.
2008 Ron Paul 38:4
Mr. Speaker, we should understand that decimating the protections that our Constitution provides us against the government is far more dangerous
to the future of this country than whatever external threats may exist. We can
protect this country without violating the Constitution and I urge my
colleagues to reconsider their support for this measure.