Society For Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications
29 June 2006
2006 Ron Paul 49:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I am not sure that the federal governments program examine
records of international financial transactions
collected by the Society for Worldwide Interbank
Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT)
is worth all the sound and fury that has surrounded
the program since its existence was
revealed last week. For one thing, this program
appears to threaten civil liberties less
than the already widely known Know Your
Customer program or the requirement that
American financial institutions file suspicious
activity reports whenever a transactions value
exceeds $10,000. However, the programs defenders
should consider the likelihood that
having federal bureaucrats wade through
mountains of SWIFT-generated data will prove
as ineffective in protecting the American people
as other government programs that rely on
sifting through mountains of financial data in
hopes of identifying suspicious transactions.
2006 Ron Paul 49:2
According to investigative journalist James Bovard, writing in the Baltimore Sun on June
28, [a] U.N. report on terrorist financing released
in May 2002 noted that a suspicious
transaction report had been filed with the U.S.
government over a $69,985 wire transfer that
Mohamed Atta, leader of the hijackers, received
from the United Arab Emirates. The report
noted that this particular transaction was
not noticed quickly enough because the report
was just one of a very large number and was
not distinguishable from those related to other
financial crimes. Congress should be skeptical,
to say the least, that giving federal bureaucrats
even more data to sift through will
make the American people safer.
2006 Ron Paul 49:3
Congress should examine all government programs that monitor the financial transactions
of American citizens to ensure they
are effective and they do not violate the rights
of Americans. Unfortunately, many of my colleagues
are attacking newspapers that inform
the American people about government surveillance
on the grounds that revealing that
the federal government is monitoring financial
transactions somehow damages national security.
It is odd to claim that, until last Friday,
neither the American people nor Americas enemies
had any idea that the government is engaging
in massive surveillance of financial
transactions, since the government has been
openly operating major financial surveillance
programs since the 1970s and both the administration
and Congress have repeatedly
discussed increasing the governments power
to monitor financial transactions. In fact, such
an expansion of the governments ability to
spy on Americans banking activites was a
major part of the PATRIOT Act.
2006 Ron Paul 49:4
Congress should be leery of criticizing media reporting on government activity. Attacking
the media for revealing information
about government surveillance of American
citizens may make reporters reluctant to aggressively
pursue stories that may embarrass
the government. A reluctance by the media to
embarrass the state will make it easier for
the federal government to get away with violating
the peoples rights. Media reports on
government surveillance and other security
programs can help Congress and the Americans
people ensure the governments actions
effectively protect Americans security without
infringing on basic constitutional liberties. I
therefore urge my colleagues to reject this resolution.