HON. RON PAUL
OF TEXAS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Thursday, June 15, 2006
2006 Ron Paul 44:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Steel Financing Fairness Act. This bill
helps our Nations beleaguered steel industry
by stopping the government from forcing
American steel workers to subsidize their foreign
competitors. Specifically, the bill prohibits
the Overseas Private Investment Corporation
(OPIC) and the Export-Import Bank
(EXIMBANK) from providing any assistance to
countries that subsidize their steel industries.
The Steel Financing Fairness Act also instructs
the Secretary of the Treasury to reduce
Americas contribution to the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) by a prorated share of
the IMFs assistance to countries that subsidize
their steel industries.
2006 Ron Paul 44:2
One of the problems facing Americas domestic steel industry is that it must compete
with foreign industries that receive subsidies
from their governments. Some of these subsidies
are explicitly intended to provide these
companies with a non-market advantage over
American steel producers. The U.S. Government
further compounds the damage caused
by these subsidies by forcing the domestic
steel producers to support their major competitors
through taxpayer-funded programs.
2006 Ron Paul 44:3
For example, according to the most recent figures available, the five countries with the
greatest EXIMBANK exposure are all among
the top ten exporters of steel and/or steel
products to the United States. In fact,
EXIMBANK has provided almost $20 billion of
U.S. taxpayer support to these countries.
2006 Ron Paul 44:4
Meanwhile, OPIC has provided almost $6 billion of the taxpayers money to leading steel
exporters. Thus, the American taxpayer has
provided at least $26 billion worth of support
to the countries that are the leading competitors
of the domestic steel industry. This does
not count the funds provided these countries
by the IMF. Since money is fungible, the practical
effect of providing aid to countries which
practice industrial policy is to free up resources
these governments can use to further
subsidize their steel industries. Thus, taxpayer
dollars sent to foreign governments and industries
can benefit foreign steel manufacturers
even if American taxpayer money is not sent
to directly benefit those industries.
2006 Ron Paul 44:5
However, hard as it may be to believe, organizations funded by American taxpayers actually
use American tax dollars to directly assist
foreign steel producers! For example,
among the projects funded by EXIMBANK in
recent years is an $18 million loan guarantee
to expand steel manufacturing in Red China.
2006 Ron Paul 44:6
Ironically, many of the supporters of these foreign giveaways claim to be promoters of
free trade. This claim makes as much sense
as a supporter of higher taxes and spending
claiming to be a fiscally conservative supporter
of limited government. Free trade is the
peaceful exchange of goods and services
across borders unhampered by government
interference. Taxing American workers to support
their overseas competitors is not free
trade. Instead, it is corporatism designed to
benefit certain politically powerful interests at
the expense of American entrepreneurs and
workers.
2006 Ron Paul 44:7
I have no doubt that Americas steel industry can out-compete the steel industry of any
country if allowed to compete on a level planning
field. Unfortunately, due in part to government
policy, todays playing field is in no way
level. Congress must end this economically
destructive, immoral, and unconstitutional policy
of forcing owners and workers in the domestic
steel industry to subsidize their competitors.
I therefore call upon my colleagues to
cosponsor the Steel Financing Fairness Act.