HON. RON PAUL
OF TEXAS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Tuesday, June 6, 2006
2006 Ron Paul 42:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, H.R. 5449 changes the rules under which the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) negotiates with Federal employees
unions, such as the National Air Traffic
Controllers Association (NATCA), to make
the FAA abide by the exact same process that
other government agencies do when they negotiate
with Federal employees unions. Contrary
to the claims of its opponents, H.R. 5449
does not allow NATCA to indefinitely prolong
negotiations. H.R. 5449 allows the FAA to act
to end negotiations and bring their case before
a Federal mediation board who has power to
resolve the dispute. H.R. 5449 would prevent
the FAA from unilaterally imposing a contract
on the air traffic controllers. In contrast, the
current system may provide the FAA with the
opportunity to drag out negotiations, so it can
ultimately declare an impasse and impose a
contract. Thus, the changes made in H.R.
5449 seem reasonable.
2006 Ron Paul 42:2
Some people, including many House of Representatives members with whom I usually
agree, are claiming that H.R. 5449 will cost
American taxpayers billions of dollars. This
claim is based on an assumption that the final
result of the mediation process established by
H.R. 5449 will be significantly more costly to
the taxpayer then the contract the FAA will impose
on the controllers if H.R. 5449 fails to
pass. However, under H.R. 5449, the dispute
will be resolved by a Federal mediation panel
whose members are appointed by the president.
I am skeptical that a presidentially appointed
mediation board will give an exorbitant
package to NATCA, especially since the difference
between the FAAs current proposal
and the NATCAs last offer is less than a billion
dollars. It is true that a future mediation
panel may be populated by people appointed
by an administration more friendly to the air
traffic controllers than the current administration,
but it is also possible that a future Congress
would use its leverage in the current
process to force the FAA to accept contracts
tilted in favor of the NATCA. We should not
judge procedural issues based on uncertain
predictions about results.
2006 Ron Paul 42:3
Some opponents of H.R. 5449 complain that the air traffic controllers are overpaid. However,
since the air traffic control system is government
controlled and government financed,
the wages of air traffic controllers are not set
by the market. Instead, these wages are set
by political and bureaucratic fiat. Absent a
market, it is imposable to say the air traffic
controllers wages are too high or too low. In
fact, given the importance of air traffic control,
it is possible that, in a free market, some air
traffic controllers may have higher incomes
than they do now. One thing I can say for sure
is that air traffic controllers would still have
their jobs if the Federal government were limited
to its constitutional functions since air traffic
controllers perform a function that would be
necessary in a free market.
2006 Ron Paul 42:4
In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, H.R. 5449 reasonably changes the process under which the
FAA negotiates with Federal employees
unions. H.R. 5449 does not favor one party
over another, and, contrary to the claims of its
opponents, H.R. 5449 does not preordain the
conclusion of the negotiations between the
FAA and NATCA.