Eliminating Foreign Aid That Helps Manipulate Elections
15 February 2006
2006 Ron Paul 2:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I intend to vote in favor of this legislation because I support any
statement by Congress indicating hesitation to
send U.S. taxpayer money abroad.
2006 Ron Paul 2:2
Unfortunately this legislation is motivated by politics rather than a genuine desire to limit
unconstitutional foreign aid programs. The
wording of the resolution itself does not close
the door to providing U.S. aid to the Palestinians
even if Hamas, the political party that
won recent parliamentary elections, takes its
seats in parliament without altering its stated
policies toward Israel. Indeed, the legislation
states that no United States assistance
should be provided directly to the Palestinian
Authority if Hamas occupies a majority of
seats in the Palestinian parliament. This obviously
suggests that the money can be spent
indirectly in any case.
2006 Ron Paul 2:3
So this is hardly a strong statement opposing any and all aid to the Palestinians, which
is the position that I hold.
2006 Ron Paul 2:4
I find it interesting that the same proponents of the United States government exporting democracy
overseas are now demanding that
something be done when people overseas do
not vote the way the U.S. Government thinks
they should. It seems that being for democracy
means respecting that people overseas
may not always vote the way Washington
wants them to vote. If our aim is to ensure
that only certain parties or individuals are allowed
to lead foreign nations, why not just
admit that democracy is the last thing we
want? That attitude is evident in the fact that
the U.S. Government spent more than $2 million
trying to manipulate the Palestinian vote in
favor of parties supported by Washington. You
cannot have it both ways. Although it is always
a good idea to eliminate foreign aid, we
should be careful about calling the manipulation
of elections overseas an exercise in democracy
promotion.