Various Foreign Policy Suspension Bills At the End Of The 109th Congress
6 December 2006
HON. RON PAUL
OF TEXAS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Wednesday, December 6, 2006
2006 Ron Paul 101:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I would like to express my concern about the House of Representatives
at the last minute rushing to the
floor dozens of bills spending tens of millions
of dollars and interfering in the affairs of foreign
countries. Mr. Speaker, we woke up this
morning with the surprise announcement that
we would face at least 35 of these suspension
bills. Suspension bills are customarily noncontroversial
— naming post offices and the
like. I can hardly think of anything more controversial
than sending tens of millions of U.S.
taxpayer dollars overseas to interfere in the affairs
of foreign countries.
2006 Ron Paul 101:2
The suspension calendar is being used to pass the reauthorization of the Export-Import
Bank, which funnels millions of U.S. taxpayer
dollars to foreign governments. For example,
through the Export-Import Bank, Americans
are forced to subsidize Chinas economic
growth with some $4 billion dollars per year. Is
this not controversial?
2006 Ron Paul 101:3
Additionally, todays suspension bills will turn an additional 52 million dollars in foreign
aid over to the Democratic Republic of the
Congo. Is this not controversial?
2006 Ron Paul 101:4
Possibly more damaging in todays noncontroversial suspension bills are the several
bills that seek to meddle in the affairs of foreign
countries. Todays suspension bills,
whether they regard Lebanon, Iran, Congo, or
Nepal, make it clear that we still have not
learned the lessons we should have learned
from Iraq and all of our previous interventions
that have gone awry. Mr. Speaker, it is bad
enough that Congress acts as if its jurisdiction
extends across the entire globe, must we add
insult to injury by treating this as simply run of
the mill, noncontroversial legislation?