HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
BEFORE THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
2004 Ron Paul 75:1
Mr. Speaker, I rise to oppose HR 163 in the strongest possible terms.
The draft, whether for military purposes or some form of
“national
service,” violates the basic moral principles of individual liberty
upon which
this country was founded. Furthermore, the military neither wants nor
needs a
draft.
2004 Ron Paul 75:2
The
Department of Defense, in response to calls to reinstate the draft, has
confirmed that conscription serves no military need. Defense officials
from both
parties have repudiated it.
Secretary
of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has stated, “The disadvantages of using
compulsion
to bring into the armed forces the men and women needed are notable,”
while
President William Clinton’s Secretary of the Army Louis Caldera, in a
speech
before the National Press Club, admitted that, Today, with our
smaller,
post-Cold War armed forces, our stronger volunteer tradition and our
need for
longer terms of service to get a good return on the high, up-front
training
costs, it would be even harder to fashion a fair draft.
2004 Ron Paul 75:3
However,
the most important reason to oppose HR 163 is that a draft violates the
very
principles of individual liberty upon which our nation was founded.
Former President Ronald Regan eloquently expressed the moral
case against
the draft in the publication
Human Events
in 1979:
“...[conscription] rests on the assumption that your kids belong
to the
state. If we buy that assumption then it is for the state — not for
parents, the
community, the religious institutions or teachers — to decide who shall
have what
values and who shall do what work, when, where and how in our society.
That
assumption isn’t a new one. The Nazis thought it was a great idea
.”
2004 Ron Paul 75:4
Some
say the 18-year old draftee “owes it” to his (or her, since HR 163
makes
woman eligible for the draft) country.
Hogwash!
It just as easily could be argued that a 50 year-old
chicken-hawk, who
promotes war and places innocent young people in danger, owes more to
the
country than the 18 year-old being denied his (or her) liberty.
2004 Ron Paul 75:5
All drafts are unfair. All 18 and
19 year olds are never drafted.
By
its very nature a draft must be discriminatory.
All drafts hit the most vulnerable young people, as the elites
learn
quickly how to avoid the risks of combat.
2004 Ron Paul 75:6
Economic hardship is great in all wars. War
is never economically beneficial except for those in position to profit
from war
expenditures.
The great tragedy of
war is that it enables the careless disregard for civil liberties of
our own
people.
Abuses of German and
Japanese Americans in World War I and World War II are well known.
2004 Ron Paul 75:7
But the real sacrifice comes with conscription — forcing a small number of young
vulnerable citizens to fight the wars that older men and women, who
seek glory
in military victory without themselves being exposed to danger,
promote.
The
draft encourages wars with neither purpose nor moral justification,
wars that
too often are not even declared by the Congress.
2004 Ron Paul 75:8
Without conscription, unpopular wars are difficult to fight. Once the draft was
undermined in the 1960s and early 1970s, the Vietnam War came to an end.
But most importantly, liberty cannot be preserved by tyranny.
A free society must always resort to volunteers.
Tyrants think nothing of forcing men to fight and serve in
wrongheaded
wars. A true fight for survival and defense of America would elicit, I
am sure,
the assistance of every able-bodied man and woman.
This is not the case with wars of mischief far away from
home, which we have experienced often in the past century.
2004 Ron Paul 75:9
A government that is willing to enslave some of its people can never be trusted
to protect the liberties of its own citizens. I hope all my colleagues
to join
me in standing up for individual liberty by rejecting HR 163 and all
tempts to
bring back the draft.