HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
BEFORE THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
2004 Ron Paul 65:1
Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this incredibly dangerous
legislation. I
hope my colleagues are not fooled by the title of this bill, “Declaring
genocide in Darfur, Sudan.” This resolution is no statement of
humanitarian
concern for what may be happening in a country thousands of miles from
the
United States. Rather, it could well lead to war against the African
country of
Sudan. The resolution “urges the Bush Administration to seriously
consider
multilateral or even unilateral intervention to prevent genocide should
the
United Nations Security Council fail to act.” We must realize the
implications
of urging the President to commit the United States to intervene in an
ongoing
civil war in a foreign land thousands of miles away.
2004 Ron Paul 65:2
Mr.
Speaker, this resolution was never marked-up in the House International
Relations Committee, on which I serve. Therefore, Members of that
committee had
no opportunity to amend it or express their views before it was sent to
the
Floor for a vote. Like too many highly controversial bills, it was
rushed onto
the suspension calendar (by House rules reserved for
“non-controversial”
legislation) at the last minute. Perhaps there was a concern that if
Members had
more time to consider the bill they would cringe at the resolution’s
call for
US military action in Sudan - particularly at a time when our military
is
stretched to the breaking point. The men and women of the United States
Armed
Forces risk their lives to protect and defend the United States. Can
anyone tell
me how sending thousands of American soldiers into harm’s way in Sudan
is by
any stretch of the imagination in the US national interest or in
keeping with
the constitutional function of this country’s military forces? I urge
my
colleagues in the strongest terms to reject this dangerous resolution.