2004 Ron Paul 57:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.
The CHAIRMAN. The Clerk will designate
the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
Amendment No. 17 offered by Mr. PAUL:
Title II of the bill is amended by striking
the item relating to MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE
CORPORATION.
The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to the
order of the House of today, the gentleman
from Texas (Mr. PAUL) and the
gentleman from Arizona (Mr. KOLBE)
each will control 10 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman
from Texas (Mr. PAUL).
2004 Ron Paul 57:2
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
(Mr. PAUL asked and was given permission
to revise and extend his remarks.)
2004 Ron Paul 57:3
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chairman, my amendment strikes the Millennium Challenge
Account. When this program was put in
place a year ago, it was originally
thought to be a program that would replace
old-fashioned foreign aid, but because
the votes were not there, instead
of a transition from one form of foreign
aid to another, it was just added on.
That is the way we do things here. We
keep adding on in order to satisfy everybody.
2004 Ron Paul 57:4
So the foreign aid bill now is up to nearly $20 billion, and that represents
$1.25 billion for the Millennium Challenge
Account, and it is a $266 million
increase from 1 year ago. So we are
making progress, if one is a strong
supporter of such programs.
2004 Ron Paul 57:5
The strongest argument of those who endorse foreign aid is a humanitarian
argument: We are rich, they are poor,
we have empathy, we must help, it is
our moral obligation. For the most
part, people go along with that. But I
have a humanitarian argument, also.
Mine is that it does not work and that,
if we indeed care about people, we
ought to be encouraging free markets
and individual liberty, and that is
when countries become more prosperous.
2004 Ron Paul 57:6
But the idea that we can promote humanitarian programs by taking literally
money from poor people in this
country and giving it to rich, influential
leaders in other countries and we
are going to have this miraculous success
I think is a myth. It does not work
that way, and there are people who are
not benefitted.
2004 Ron Paul 57:7
Now, it may be said by those who have promoted the Millennium Challenge
Account, that is exactly what we
are trying to address. We want to reward
countries that are moving in the
direction of free markets. Now, that is
a nice notion, but it cannot work. It is
impossible because when we give
money to a government, it is politicized.
It becomes bureaucratic, and it
has to be handed out to special interests.
2004 Ron Paul 57:8
When Paul Applegarth, the chairman of the corporation for the Millennium
Challenge Account was before our committee,
I asked him a question. I said,
are there any American companies
that will benefit by this type of program?
I actually was pretty shocked
with his answer, because he was very
blunt. He said, I certainly hope so. In
other words, even our American corporations
benefit from programs like
this.
2004 Ron Paul 57:9
So it would be nice to think that the poor people of these other countries are
going to benefit, but I think it is a
greater injury to the poor people of
this country. My colleagues say the
poor people of this country do not pay
taxes. Well, that is incorrect, because
the inflation tax is borne by the poor
and the middle class, and that occurs
when we spend too much money. And
this is too much money spent the
wrong way, and we do not have the authority
to do it. Besides, how many of
us ever get calls from our constituents
saying please vote for more foreign
aid? No, they are asking for more help
here, and this distracts from it.
2004 Ron Paul 57:10
When we do not have the money, we run up the debt. Then we go and we literally
print the money to pay the bills.
We create the inflation and the higher
cost of living, and it injures the low
and middle income people the most,
and they are the ones who are losing
jobs.
2004 Ron Paul 57:11
So this is literally money coming out of our pockets for programs that could
help us in this country.
2004 Ron Paul 57:12
My suggestion is, since I am a moderate here in the Congress, my moderate
approach would be when we have
a program like this, whether it is 1.25
or the whole $20 billion, my suggestion
is cut it, cut the whole thing. Let us
say we cut the $20 billion of foreign aid.
I would take $10 billion and put it toward
the deficit, and I would join my
colleagues on the left and say, look, let
us fund some of these programs that
are needed or are coming up short. Why
are we cutting veterans benefits at the
same time? Why do we cut the Corps of
Engineers? Why do we not fully fund
our infrastructure?
2004 Ron Paul 57:13
This type of spending does not make any economic sense, and it does not
make any moral sense.