2004 Ron Paul 39:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I will vote for H.R. 4520 today because the tax cuts contained in
the bill outweigh the unfortunate but inevitable
subsidies also included. I promise my constituents
that I will vote for all tax cuts and against
all new spending. So when faced with a bill
that contains both, my decision is based on
whether the bill cuts taxes overall, i.e. whether
its ultimate impact will be to reduce or increase
federal revenues. This legislation does
reduce revenues, and therefore takes a small
step towards reducing the size of the federal
government. So while I certainly object to
some parts of the bill, especially the tobacco
bailout, I do support tax cuts.
2004 Ron Paul 39:2
My biggest concern with the bill, however, is not based on its contents. I object to the process
underlying the bill and the political reason
for which it was written. This bill is on the floor
for one reason and one reason only: the
World Trade Organization demanded that we
change our domestic tax law. Since America
first joined the WTO in 1994, Europe has objected
to how we tax American companies on
their overseas earnings. The EU took its dispute
to the WTO grievance board, which voted
in favor of the Europeans. After all, its not fair
for high-tax Europe to compete with relatively
low tax America; the only solution is to force
the U.S. to tax its companies more. The WTO
ruling was clear: Congress must change
American tax rules to comply with international
law.
2004 Ron Paul 39:3
Sadly, Congress chose to comply. We scrambled to change our corporate tax laws in
2001, but failed to appease the Europeans.
They again complained to the WTO, which
again sided with the EU. So were back to the
drawing board, working overtime to change
our domestic laws to satisfy the WTO and the
Europeans.
2004 Ron Paul 39:4
This outrageous affront to our national sovereignty was of course predictable when we
joined the WTO. During congressional debates
we were assured that entry into the organization
posed no threat whatsoever to our sovereignty.
But this was nonsense. A Congressional
Research Service report was quite clear
about the consequences of our membership:
As a member of the WTO, the United States
does commit to act in accordance with the
rules of the multi-lateral body. It is legally obligated
to insure that national laws do not conflict
with WTO rules. With the Europeans and
the WTO now telling us our laws are illegal
and must be changed, its hard to imagine a
more blatant loss of American sovereignty.
2004 Ron Paul 39:5
The bill does cut taxes overall, and for that reason I will vote in favor of it. Any legislation
that results in less money being sent to the
black hole that is the federal Treasury is worth
supporting. I especially support the provision
that allows Texans (and citizens of other
states that do not have an income tax) to deduct
state sales taxes, and will vote yes accordingly.