HON. RON PAUL
OF TEXAS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Wednesday, September 10, 2003
2003 Ron Paul 97:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Steel Financing Fairness Act. This bill
helps our Nations beleaguered steel industry
by stopping the Government from forcing
American steel workers to subsidize their foreign
competitors. Specifically, the bill prohibits
the Overseas Private Investment Corporation
(OPIC) and the Export-Import Bank
(EXIMBANK) from providing any assistance to
countries that subsidize their steel industries.
The Steel Financing Fairness Act also instructs
the Secretary of the Treasury to reduce
Americas contribution to the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) by a prorated share of
the IMFs assistance to countries that subsidize
their steel industries.
2003 Ron Paul 97:2
No one can doubt that the United States steel industry is in crisis. Approximately 15
million tons of flat-rolled capability (20 percent
of the existing domestic capacity base at the
start of 2000) was closed in the 18 months
from September 2000 to December 2001. The
decline of the steel industry has a human cost:
in just the last five years, 30,000 Americans
once productively employed in the steel industry
have joined the ranks of the unemployed.
2003 Ron Paul 97:3
One of the problems facing Americas domestic steel industry is that it must compete
with foreign industries that receive subsidies
from their governments. Some of these subsidies
are explicitly intended to provide these
companies with a non-market advantage over
American steel producers. The U.S. Government
further compounds the damage caused
by these subsidies by forcing the domestic
steel producers to support their major competitors
through taxpayer-funded programs.
2003 Ron Paul 97:4
For example, according to the most recent figures available, the eight countries with the
greatest EXIMBANK exposure are all among
the top ten exporters of steel and/or steel
products to the United States. In fact,
EXIMBANK has provided over $250 billion of
U.S. taxpayer support to these countries.
2003 Ron Paul 97:5
Meanwhile, OPIC has provided over $3 billion of the taxpayers money to seven of the
top ten leading steel exporters. Thus, the
American taxpayer has provided at least $253
billion worth of support to the countries that
are the leading competitors of the domestic
steel industry. This does not count the funds
provided these countries by the IMF. Since
money is fungible, the practical effect of providing
aid to countries which practice industrial
policy is to free up resources these governments
can use to further subsidize their steel
industries. Thus, taxpayer dollars sent to foreign
governments and industries can benefit
foreign steel manufacturers even if American
taxpayer money is not sent to directly benefit
those industries.
2003 Ron Paul 97:6
However, hard as it may be to believe, organizations funded by American taxpayers actually
use American tax dollars to directly assist
foreign steel producers! For example,
among the projects funded by EXIMBANK in
recent years is an $18 million loan guarantee
to expand steel manufacturing in Red China.
2003 Ron Paul 97:7
Ironically, many of the supporters of these foreign giveaways claim to be promoters of
free trade. This claim makes as much sense
as a supporter of higher taxes and spending
claiming to be a fiscally conservative supporter
of limited government. Free trade is the
peaceful exchange of goods and services
across borders unhampered by government
interference. Taxing American workers to support
their overseas competitors is not free
trade. Instead, it is corporatism designed to
benefit certain politically powerful interests at
the expense of American entrepreneurs and
workers.
2003 Ron Paul 97:8
I have no doubt that Americas steel industry can out-compete the steel industry of any
country if allowed to compete on a level planning
field. Unfortunately, due in part to government
policy, todays playing field is in no way
level. Congress must end this economically
destructive, immoral, and unconstitutional policy
of forcing owners and workers in the domestic
steel industry to subsidize their competitors.
I therefore call upon my colleagues to
cosponsor the Steel Financing Fairness Act.