The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a
previous order of the House, the gentleman
from Texas (Mr. PAUL) is recognized
for 5 minutes.
2003 Ron Paul 56:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, the current tax debate is more about politics than
serious economics. Both sides use demagoguery
but propose only modest tax
cuts. The benefits that could come
from the current tax cut proposal, unfortunately,
are quite small and not
immediate.
2003 Ron Paul 56:2
Some say tax cuts raise revenues by addressing economic activity, thus providing
Congress with even more money
to spend. Others say lowering taxes
simply lowers revenues and increases
deficits. Some say we must target tax
cuts to the poor and the middle class so
they will spend more money. Others
say tax cuts should be targeted to the
rich so they can invest and create jobs.
We must accept that it is hard to give
tax cuts to people who do not pay
taxes. But we could, if we wanted, cut
payroll taxes for lower-income workers.
2003 Ron Paul 56:3
The truth is, government officials cannot know what consumers and investors
will do if they get a tax cut.
Plugging tax cut data into a computer
and expecting an accurate projection of
the economic outcome is about as reliable
as asking Congress to project government
surpluses. Two important
points are purposely ignored: first, the
money people earn is their own, and
they have a moral right to keep as
much of it as possible. It is not Congress
money to spend. Government
spending is the problem. Taking a big
chunk of the peoples earnings out of
the economy, whether through taxes or
borrowing, is always harmful. Taxation
is more honest and direct and the harm
is less hidden. Borrowing, especially
since the Federal Reserve creates credit
out of thin air to loan to big spenders
in Congress, is more deceitful. It
hides the effects and delays the consequences.
But over the long term, this
method of financing is much more dangerous.
2003 Ron Paul 56:4
The process by which the Fed monetizes debt and accommodates Congress
contributes to, if not causes, most of
our problems. This process of government
financing generates the business
cycle and thus increases unemployment.
It destroys the value of the dollar
and thus causes price inflation. It
encourages deficits by reducing restraints
on congressional spending. It
encourages an increase in the current
account deficit, the dollar being the reserve
currency of the world, and causes
huge foreign indebtedness. It reflects a
philosophy of instant gratification that
says, live for the pleasures of today and
have future generations pay the bills.
2003 Ron Paul 56:5
Two final points to remember: whether or not people can keep what
they earn is first a moral issue, and
second an economic issue. Tax cuts
should never be referred to as a cost
to government. Tax cuts should be
much bigger and come much sooner for
everyone.
2003 Ron Paul 56:6
Remember, the real issue is total spending by government. Yet this issue
is ignored or politicized by both sides
of the aisle here in Congress. The political
discussion about whether to cut
taxes has avoided the real issue and instead
has degenerated into charges of
class and party warfare, with both
sides lusting for power. Of course, the
great issue for the ages, namely, what
is the proper role for government in a
constitutional republic, is totally ignored.
Yet another question remains:
Are the American people determined
they still wish to have a constitutional
Republic?