Improving Educational Results For Children With Disabilities Act
30 April 2003
2003 Ron Paul 52:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chairman, I rise to oppose H.R. 1350, the Improving Education Results
for Children with Disabilities Act. I oppose this
bill as a strong supporter of doing everything
possible to advance the education of persons
with disabilities. However, I believe this bill is
yet another case of false advertising by supporters
of centralized education, as it expands
the federal education bureaucracy and thus
strips control over education from local communities
and the parents of disabled children.
Parents and local communities know their children
so much better than any federal bureaucrat,
and they can do a better job of meeting
a childs needs than we in Washington. There
is no way that the unique needs of my grandchildren,
and some young boy or girl in Los
Angeles, CA or New York City can be educated
by some sort of Cookie Cutter approach.
In fact, the Cookie Cutter approach
is especially inappropriate for special needs
children.
2003 Ron Paul 52:2
At a time when Congress should be returning power and funds to the states, IDEA increases
Federal control over education. Under
this bill, expenditures on IDEA will total over
$100 billion by the year 2011. After 2011, congressional
appropriators are free to spend as
much as they wish on this program. This flies
in the face of many members public commitment
to place limits on the scope of the Federal
bureaucracy.
2003 Ron Paul 52:3
There are attempts in this bill to reduce the role of bureaucracy and paperwork, and some
provisions will benefit children. In particular, I
applaud the efforts of the drafters of those
who drafted it to address the over-prescription
of psychotropic drugs, such as Ritalin by ensuring
that no child shall be placed on these
drugs without parental consent.
2003 Ron Paul 52:4
However, H.R. 1350 still imposes significant costs on state governments and localities. For
example, this bill places new mandates on
state and local schools to offer special services
in areas with significant overidentification
of disabled students. Mr. Chairman, the
problem of overidentification is one created by
the Federal mandates and federal spending of
IDEA! So once again, Congress is using problems
created by their prior mandates to justify
imposing new mandates on the states!
2003 Ron Paul 52:5
When I think of imposing new mandates on local schools, I think of a survey of teachers
my office conducted last year. According to
this survey, over 65 percent of teachers felt
that the federal mandates are excessive. In
fact, the area where most teachers indicated
there is too much federal involvement is disabilities
education.
2003 Ron Paul 52:6
I would ask all my colleagues to consider whether we are truly aiding education by imposing
new mandates, or just making it more
difficult for hard-working, education professionals
to properly educate our children?
2003 Ron Paul 52:7
The major federal mandate in IDEA is that disabled children be educated in the least restrictive
setting. In other words, this bill makes
mainstreaming the federal policy. Many children
may thrive in a mainstream classroom
environment; however, I worry that some children
may be mainstreamed solely because
school officials believe federal law requires it,
even though the mainstream environment is
not the most appropriate for that child.
2003 Ron Paul 52:8
On May 10, 1994, Dr. Mary Wagner testified before the Education Committee that disabled
children who are not placed in mainstream
classrooms graduate from high school at a
much higher rate than disabled children who
are mainstreamed. Dr. Wagner quite properly
accused Congress of sacrificing children to
ideology.
2003 Ron Paul 52:9
H.R. 1350 also burdens parents by requiring them to go through a time-consuming process
of bureaucracy and litigation to obtain a proper
education for their child. I have been told that
there are trial lawyers actively soliciting dissatisfied
parents of special needs children as clients
for lawsuits against local schools! Parents
and school districts should not be wasting resources
that could go to educating children
enriching trial lawyers.
2003 Ron Paul 52:10
Instead of placing more federal control on education, Congress should allow parents of
disabled children the ability to obtain the type
of education appropriate for that childs unique
needs by passing my Help and Opportunities
for Parents of Exceptional Children (HOPE for
Children) Act of 2003, H.R. 1575. This bill allows
parents of children with a learning disability
a tax cut of up to $3,000 for educational
expenses. Parents could use this credit to pay
for special services for their child, or to pay
tuition at private school or even to home
school their child. By allowing parents of special
needs children to control the education
dollar, the HOPE for Children Act allows parents
to control their childs education. Thus,
this bill helps parents of special needs children
provide their child an education tailored to the
childs unique needs.
2003 Ron Paul 52:11
The HOPE for Children Act allows parents of special needs children to provide those children
with an education that matches their
childs unique needs without having to beg
permission of education bureaucrats or engage
in lengthy and costly litigation.
2003 Ron Paul 52:12
Mr. Chairman, it is time to stop sacrificing children on the altar of ideology. Every child is
unique and special. Given the colossal failure
of Washingtons existing interference, it is
clear that all children will be better off when
we get Washington out of their classroom and
out of their parents pocketbooks. I therefore
urge my colleagues to cast a vote for constitutionally
limited government and genuine compassion
by opposing H.R. 1350 and supporting
the HOPE for Children Act.