2002 Ron Paul 75:1
Mr. Speaker, like many
Americans, I am
greatly concerned about abortion. Abortion on demand is no doubt the
most
serious social-political problem of our age. The lack of respect for
life that
permits abortion significantly contributes to our violent culture and
our
careless attitude toward liberty.
2002 Ron Paul 75:2
Whether a civilized society
treats
human life with dignity or contempt determines the outcome of that
civilization.
Reaffirming the importance of the sanctity of life is crucial for the
continuation of a civilized society. There is already strong evidence
that we
are indeed on the slippery slope toward euthanasia and human
experimentation.
Although the real problem lies within the hearts and minds of the
people, the
legal problems of protecting life stem from the ill-advised Roe v. Wade
ruling,
a ruling that constitutionally should never have occurred.
2002 Ron Paul 75:3
The best solution, of course,
is not
now available to us. That would be a Supreme Court that recognizes that
for all
criminal laws, the several states retain jurisdiction. Something that
Congress
can do is remove the issue from the jurisdiction of the lower federal
courts, so
that states can deal with the problems surrounding abortion, thus
helping to
reverse some of the impact of Roe v. Wade.
2002 Ron Paul 75:4
Unfortunately, H.R. 4965 takes
a
different approach, one that is not only constitutionally flawed, but
flawed in
principle, as well. Though I will vote to ban the horrible
partial-birth
abortion procedure, I fear that the language and reasoning used in this
bill do
not further the pro-life cause, but rather cement fallacious principles
into
both our culture and legal system.
2002 Ron Paul 75:5
For example, 14G in the
"Findings" section of this bill states, "...such a prohibition
[upon the partial-birth abortion procedure] will draw a bright line
that clearly
distinguishes abortion and infanticide..." The question I wish to pose
in
response is this: Is not the fact that life begins at conception the
main tenet
of the pro-life community? By stating that we are drawing a "bright
line" between abortion and infanticide, I fear that we are simply
reinforcing the dangerous idea underlying Roe v. Wade, which is the
belief that
we as human beings can determine which members of the human family are
"expendable," and which are not.
2002 Ron Paul 75:6
The belief that we as a
society can
decide which persons are "expendable," leads us directly down a
slippery slope of violence and apathy toward humanity. Though many
decry such
ethicists as Peter Singer of Princeton, who advocates the "right" of
parents to choose infanticide, as well as euthanasia, his reasoning is
simply a
logical extension of the ethic underlying Roe v. Wade, which is that if
certain
people are not "useful" or "convenient," they should be done
away with.
2002 Ron Paul 75:7
H.R. 4965 also depends heavily
upon a
"distinction" made by the Court in both Roe v. Wade and Planned
Parenthood v. Casey, which established that a child within the womb is
not
protected under law, but one outside of the womb is. By depending upon
this
false and illogical "distinction," I fear that H.R. 4965, as I stated
before, ingrains the principles of Roe v. Wade into our justice system,
rather
than refutes them as it should.
2002 Ron Paul 75:8
Despite its severe flaws, this
bill
nonetheless has the possibility of saving innocent human life, and
should
therefore be supported. I fear, though, that when the pro-life
community uses
the arguments of the opposing side to advance its agenda, it does more
harm than
good.
2002 Ron Paul 75:9
I wish to conclude with a
quote from
Mother Theresa, who gave a beautiful and powerful speech about abortion
on
February 3, 1994, at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington DC:
"...From here, a sign of care for the weakest of the weak- the unborn
child- must go out to the world. If you (in the United States) become a
burning
light of justice and peace in the world, then really you will be true
to what
the founders of this country stood for..."
2002 Ron Paul 75:10
May we see bills in the future
that
stay true to the solid principles the founders of this country stood
for, rather
than waver and compromise these principles.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr072402.htm