2002 Ron Paul 55:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I wish to
call my colleagues attention to the following article entitled Bad Tax
Policy: You Can Run ..... by Daniel Mitchell, McKenna Senior Fellow at the
Heritage Foundation. Mr. Mitchell discusses the practice of companies
reincorporating in foreign jurisdictions to reduce their tax liability. As Mr. Mitchell
points out, reincorporation benefits shareholders and American workers. This is
because reincorporation In a low-tax foreign jurisdiction makes companies more
competitive, thus enabling the companies to create new and better jobs
for working Americans. Furthermore, reincorporation helps protect American
companies from corporate takeovers by foreign investors. Americas
anti-competitive tax system is a major reason why several US companies have been taken over
by foreign business interests.
2002 Ron Paul 55:2
In the vast majority of cases,
when a company moves its corporate headquarters to a foreign jurisdiction, it
maintains its physical operations in America. In fact, Mr. Speaker, Stanley
Company, whose recently-announced decision to incorporate in Bermuda has caused much
handwringing over reincorporation, will not be laying off a single
American worker as a consequence of their action!
2002 Ron Paul 55:3
Though reincorporation
benefits American investors and workers, some of my colleagues have objected to
reincorporation because this action deprives the government of revenue.
Some have even gone so far as to question the patriotism of companies that
reincorporate. However, there is nothing unpatriotic about trying to
minimize ones tax burden to enhance economic competitiveness. In fact, it could
be argued that since reincorporation helps companies create new jobs and
expand the American economy, those who reincorporate are behaving patriotically.
2002 Ron Paul 55:4
One also could argue that it
is those who oppose reincorporation who do not grasp the essence of the American
system. After all, two of the main principles underlying the Constitution and
the Declaration of Independence are limited government and respect for
private property. In contrast, opponents of reincorporation implicitly assume
that the government owns all of a nations assets; therefore taxpayers never
should take any actions to deny government what the politicians have determined to
be their fair share. Mr. Speaker, this philosophy has more in common with
medieval feudalism than with the constitutional republic created by the
drafters of the Constitution.
2002 Ron Paul 55:5
In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I
once again urge my colleagues to read Mr. Mitchells article, which
forcefully makes the case that taxing offshore income is economically destructive. Such
taxation also is inconsistent with the respect for individual liberty and
private property rights which forms the foundation of Americas constitutional
republic, as well as a threat to the sovereign right of nations to determine the
tax treatment of income earned inside national borders. I hope my
colleagues will reject efforts to subject companies that reincorporate overseas to
burdensome new taxes and regulations. Expanding federal power in order to prevent
companies from reincorporating will only kill American jobs and further weaken
Americas economy.
[From the Washington Times, May 8, 2002]
BAD TAX POLICY: YOU CAN RUN .....
(By Daniel Mitchell)
The worst Supreme Court decision of all
time? One of the leading candidates has to be the infamous 1857 Dred
Scott decision, in which the Supreme Court ruled that slaves did not gain
freedom by escaping to nonslave states.
2002 Ron Paul 55:7
Instead, they were considered property
and had to be returned to their owners.
2002 Ron Paul 55:8
Some U.S. companies soon may be treated
in a similar manner, thanks to legislation being touted by Sens. Max
Baucus, Montana Democrat, and Charles Grassley, Iowa Republican.
2002 Ron Paul 55:9
It all starts with the
Internal Revenue Code, which forces U.S.-based companies to pay an extra layer of tax on
income earned in other countries.
2002 Ron Paul 55:10
In an effort to protect the
interests of workers, shareholders and consumers, some of these companies are
escaping bad U.S. tax law by rechartering in Bermuda.
2002 Ron Paul 55:11
This is a win-win situation
for America. We get to keep factories and headquarters in America, and our
companies remain on a level playing field with businesses based in Europe and
elsewhere.
2002 Ron Paul 55:12
Not so fast, Sens. Baucus and Grassley
are saying. They want to stop corporate expatriations, even though
they keep American jobs in America and help U.S. companies compete with
their counterparts in Europe and Asia.
2002 Ron Paul 55:13
Their legislation would forbid
U.S. companies from re-chartering in countries with better tax laws.
2002 Ron Paul 55:14
The politicians who support
this are acting as if these companies belonged to the government. Yet when House
Minority Leader Richard Gephardt, Missouri Democrat, for instance, accuses them
of being "unpatriotic," he never explains whats so patriotic
about higher taxes and noncompetitive tax policy.
2002 Ron Paul 55:15
Republicans are doing their
share of business-bashing, too. Mr. Grassley claims that corporate expatriations
are :immoral,'' as if companies would be moral if they instead kept their
U.S. charters and fired some of their workers.
2002 Ron Paul 55:16
If politicians are upset that
some companies want to recharter, they should blame themselves for trying to
tax worldwide income. An American firm competing against a Dutch firm
for a contract in Ireland, for instance, must pay a 35 percent tax on its
income ndash; and the lions share goes to the IRS.
2002 Ron Paul 55:17
The Dutch firm, by contrast,
pays only the 10 percent Irish tax on its Irish-source income because the
Netherlands doesnt tax income earned outside its borders.
2002 Ron Paul 55:18
Before giving the IRS more
power, politicians should consider the following:
2002 Ron Paul 55:19
Expatriation helps control
government waste. High-tax California cant stop companies from moving to low-tax
Nevada. Knowing this helps deter the big-spenders in the state capitol from
wasting even more money. The politicians in Massachusetts must exercise some
restraint because they know local businesses can flee to low-tax New Hampshire.
Nations also should be subject to market discipline. This is why Washington
politicians shouldnt stop companies from escaping bad U.S. tax law.
2002 Ron Paul 55:20
Expatriation protects American
jobs. Rechartering in another jurisdiction doesnt mean factories will go
overseas. Nor does it require a company to move its headquarters. It simply means
a company is chartered under the laws of a different jurisdiction, much
as many American companies are chartered in Delaware, but operate factories and
have their home offices in other states. In the case of expatriations, the
newly formed foreign company still maintains its U.S. operations, but now
wont have to fire workers since it can compete more effectively with overseas
businesses.
2002 Ron Paul 55:21
Expatriation is not tax
evasion. All corporations, regardless of where theyre based, pay tax to the IRS on
all profits they earn in the United States. This is true of U.S.-based
companies, and its true of all foreign-based companies- including those that
expatriate. All that changes is that expatriating companies no longer have to pay
taxes on income earned outside Americas borders. Since worldwide taxation is
misguided tax policy, this is a positive result. Indeed, every tax reform plan,
including the flat tax, is based on this common-sense principle of territorial
taxation.
2002 Ron Paul 55:22
Now is hardly the time, with
the economy in the midst of recovery, for Washington politicians to make
U.S. companies less competitive. Nor is it the time to give the IRS the
power to prohibit businesses from rechartering in jurisdictions with more
sensible tax laws. Instead of treating companies as if theyre federal property,
Sens. Grassley and Baucus should be fixing the problems in the tax code.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr061202b.htm