2002 Ron Paul 53:1
Mr. PAUL. Madam Speaker, I rise in
opposition to this bill. This bill is
nothing more than subsidies for big
corporations. If one were to look at the
Constitution and look for authority for
legislation of this sort in article I, section
8, it would not be found. That in
itself should be reason to stop and
think about this, but we do not look at
that particular article too often any
more.
2002 Ron Paul 53:2
Also for moral reasons, I object to
this. Even if we accepted the idea that
we should interfere and be involved in
this type of activity, it is unfair because
the little guy gets squeezed and
the big guy gets all of the money. It is
not morally fair because it cannot be.
2002 Ron Paul 53:3
One thing that annoys me the most is
when Members come to the floor and in
the name of free trade say we have to
support the Export-Import Bank. This
is the opposite of free trade. Free trade
is good. Low tariffs are good, which
lead to lower prices; but subsidies to
our competitors is not free trade. We
should call it for what it is. We have
Members who claim they are free traders,
and yet support managed trade
through NAFTA and WTO and all these
special interest management schemes,
as well as competitive devaluation of
currencies with the notion that we
might increase exports. This has nothing
to do with free trade.
2002 Ron Paul 53:4
I am a strong advocate for free trade,
and for that reason I think this bill
should not be passed. There are good
economic reasons not to support this.
Because some who favor this bill argue
that some of these companies are doing
risky things and they do not qualify in
the ordinary banking system for these
loans and, therefore, they need a little
bit of help. That is precisely when we
should not be helping. If there is a risk,
it is telling us there is something
wrong and we should not do it. It is
transferring the liability from the
company to the taxpayer. So the risk
argument does not hold water at all.
2002 Ron Paul 53:5
The other reason why economically
it is unsound, is that this is a form of
credit allocation. If a bank has money
and they can get a guarantee from the
Export-Import Bank, they will always
choose the guarantee over the nonguarantee,
so who gets squeezed. The funds
are taken out of the investment pool.
The little people get squeezed. They do
not get the loan, but they are totally
unknown. Nobody sees those who did
not get a loan. All we see is the loan
that benefits somebody on the short
run. But really on the long run, it benefits
the big corporations. Many times
it doesnt even do that.
2002 Ron Paul 53:6
Take a look at Enron. We have mentioned
Enron quite a few times already.
If we add up all of the subsidies to
Enron, it adds up to $1.9 billion. That is
if we add up the subsidies from OPIC as
well. And look at what Enron did. They
ran a few risks, and then they lost
it. Who was left holding the bag? The
taxpayers.
2002 Ron Paul 53:7
Madam Speaker, I strongly urge a no
vote on this bill. If Members are for
free trade, they will vote against this
bill, and will vote for true free trade.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at RP URL http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr060502b.htm