2002 Ron Paul 4:1
Mr. Chairman, the recent
economic
difficulties in Argentina provide many valuable lessons for policy
makers, both
in America and the rest of the world. Unfortunately, early signals
indicate that
many are drawing the wrong lesson from this crisis.
2002 Ron Paul 4:2
In the last several months,
too many
commentators and policy makers have pointed the finger of blame for
Argentinas
economic crisis at deregulation, free markets, and free trade. The
logical
conclusion of this analysis is that Argentina should embrace
protectionism,
increased welfare spending, regulation, and maybe even return to the
days when
all major industry in the country was nationalized. However, those
familiar with
the economic history of the twentieth century will find this analysis
shocking-
after all, if state control of the economy was the path to prosperity,
then Cuba
and North Korea would be the worlds richest countries and leading
economies!
2002 Ron Paul 4:3
In fact, Mr. Chairman,
Argentina does
not represent an exception to the laws of economics. Rather,
Argentinas
economic collapse is but one more example of the folly of government
intervention in the economy done to benefit powerful special interests
at the
expense of the Argentine people and the American taxpayer. The primary
means by
which the federal government forces American taxpayers to underwrite
the
destruction of the Argentine economy is the International Monetary Fund
(IMF),
which enjoys a $37 billion line of credit provided with U.S. Treasury
funds.
2002 Ron Paul 4:4
Despite clear signs over the
past
several years that the Argentine economy was in serious trouble, the
IMF
continued pouring taxpayer-subsidized loans with an incredibly low
interest rate
of 2.6% into the country. In 2001, as Argentinas fiscal position
steadily
deteriorated, the IMF funneled over 8 billion dollars to the Argentine
government!
2002 Ron Paul 4:5
According to our colleague,
Congressman
Jim Saxton, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee, this "Continued
lending over many years sustained and subsidized a bankrupt Argentine
economic
policy, whose collapse is now all the more serious. The IMFs generous
subsidized bailouts lead to moral hazard problems, and enable shaky
governments
to pressure the IMF for even more funding or risk disaster."
2002 Ron Paul 4:6
Argentina is just the latest
example of
the folly of IMF policies. Only three years ago the world economy was
rocked by
an IMF-created disaster in Asia. The IMF regularly puts taxpayers on
the hook
for the mistakes of the big banks. Oftentimes, Mr. Chairman, IMF funds
end up in
the hands of corrupt dictators who use the taxpayer-provided largesse
to prop up
their regimes by rewarding their supporters and depriving their
opponents access
to capital.
2002 Ron Paul 4:7
Even if they are not corrupt,
most IMF
borrowers are governments of countries with little economic
productivity. Either
way, most recipient nations end up with huge debts that they cannot
service,
which only adds to their poverty and instability. IMF money ultimately
corrupts
those countries it purports to help, by keeping afloat reckless
political
institutions that destroy their own economies.
2002 Ron Paul 4:8
IMF policies ultimately are
based on a
flawed philosophy that says the best means of creating economic
prosperity is
government-to-government transfers. Such programs cannot produce
growth, because
they take capital out of private hands, where it can be allocated to
its most
productive use as determined by the choices of consumers in the market,
and
place it in the hands of politicians. Placing economic resources in the
hands of
politicians and bureaucrats inevitably results in inefficiencies,
shortages, and
an economic crisis, as even the best intentioned politicians cannot
know the
most efficient use of resources.
2002 Ron Paul 4:9
In addition, Mr. Chairman, the
IMF
violates basic constitutional and moral principles. The federal
government has
no constitutional authority to fund international institutions such as
the IMF,
and it is simply immoral to take money form hard-working Americas to
support the
economic schemes of politically-powerful special interests and
third-world
dictators.
2002 Ron Paul 4:10
The only constituency for the
IMF are
the huge multinational banks and corporations. Big banks used IMF
funds-
taxpayer funds- to bail themselves out from billions in losses after
the Asian
financial crisis. Big corporations obtain lucrative contracts for a
wide variety
of construction projects funded with IMF loans. Its a familiar game in
Washington, with corporate
welfare
disguised as compassion for the poor.
2002 Ron Paul 4:11
Mr. Chairman, the damage
inflicted by
the IMF on Argentina is immense and inexcusable. This is yet further
proof that
the IMF was a bad idea from the very beginning- economically,
constitutionally,
and morally. However, perhaps some good can come out of this debacle if
it
causes Congress to at last rethink Americas foolish participation in
the IMF.
This is why I will soon be introducing legislation to withdraw America
from the
IMF. I hope my colleagues will join me in working to protect the
American
taxpayer from underwriting the destruction of countries like Argentina,
by
working with me to end Americas support for the IMF.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr020602.htm