2002 Ron Paul 20:1
Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce legislation expressing the sense of
Congress that the United States government should not revive military
conscription. Supporters of conscription have taken advantage of the events of
September 11 to renew efforts to reinstate the military draft. However, reviving the
draft may actually weaken America’s military. Furthermore, a military draft
violates the very principles of individual liberty this country was founded upon. It
is no exaggeration to state that military conscription is better suited for a
totalitarian government, such as the recently dethroned Taliban regime,
than a free society.
2002 Ron Paul 20:2
Since military conscription ended over 30 years ago, voluntary armed
services have successfully fulfilled the military needs of the United States.
The recent success of the military campaign in Afghanistan once again demonstrates
the ability of the volunteer military to respond to threats to the lives,
liberty, and property of the people of the United States.
2002 Ron Paul 20:3
A draft weakens the military by introducing tensions and rivalries
between those who volunteer for military service and those who have been
conscripted. This undermines the cohesiveness of military units, which is a vital
element of military effectiveness. Conscripts also are unlikely to choose the
military as a career; thus, a draft will do little to address problems with
retention. With today’s high-tech military, retention is the most important personnel
issue and it seems counter-productive to adopt any policy that will not
address this important issue.
2002 Ron Paul 20:4
If conscription helps promote an effective military, then why did
General Vladisova Putilin, Chief of the Russian General Staff, react to plans
to end the military draft in Russia, by saying "This is the great dream of all
servicemen, when our army will become completely professional...?"
2002 Ron Paul 20:5
Instead of reinstating a military draft, Congress should make
military service attractive by finally living up to its responsibility to
provide good benefits and pay to members of the armed forces and our nation’s
veterans. It is an outrage that American military personnel and veterans are given a
lower priority in the federal budget than spending to benefit politically
powerful special interests. Until this is changed, we will never have a military
which reflects our nation’s highest ideals.
2002 Ron Paul 20:6
Mr. Speaker, the most important reason to oppose reinstatement of a
military draft is that conscription violates the very principles upon which this
country was founded. The basic premise underlying conscription is that the
individual belongs to the state, individual rights are granted by the state, and
therefore politicians can abridge individual rights at will. In contrast, the
philosophy which inspired America’s founders, expressed in the Declaration of
Independence, is that individuals possess natural, God-given rights
which cannot be abridged by the government. Forcing people into military service
against their will thus directly contradicts the philosophy of the Founding
Fathers. A military draft also appears to contradict the constitutional
prohibition of involuntary servitude.
2002 Ron Paul 20:7
During the War of 1812, Daniel Webster eloquently made the case that
a military draft was unconstitutional: " Where is it written in the
Constitution , in what article or section is it contained, that you may
take children from their parents, and parents from their children, and
compel them to fight the battles of any war, in which the folly or the wickedness of
Government may engage it? Under what concealment has this power lain hidden, which
now for the first time comes forth, with a tremendous and baleful aspect, to
trample down and destroy the dearest rights of personal liberty? Sir, I almost
disdain to go to quotations and references to prove that such an abominable
doctrine had no foundation in the Constitution of the country. It is enough to know
that the instrument was intended as the basis of a free government, and that the
power contended for is incompatible with any notion of personal liberty. An
attempt to maintain this doctrine upon the provisions of the Constitution is an
exercise of perverse ingenuity to extract slavery from the substance of a free
government. It is an attempt to show, by proof and argument, that we ourselves are
subjects of despotism, and that we have a right to chains and bondage, firmly
secured to us and our children, by the provisions of our government."
2002 Ron Paul 20:8
Another eloquent opponent of the draft was former President Ronald
Reagan who in a 1979 column on conscription said: "...it rests on the assumption
that your kids belong to the state. If we buy that assumption then it is for
the state — not for parents, the community, the religious institutions or
teachers — to decide who shall have what values and who shall do what work,
when, where and how in our society. That assumption isn’t a new one. The Nazis
thought it was a great idea."
2002 Ron Paul 20:9
President Reagan and Daniel Webster are not the only prominent
Americans to oppose conscription. In fact, throughout American history the draft has
been opposed by Americans from across the political spectrum, from Henry
David Thoreau to Barry Goldwater to Bill Bradley to Jesse Ventura.
Organizations opposed to conscription range from the American Civil Liberties Union
to the United Methodist Church General Board of Church and Society, and from
the National Taxpayers Union to the Conservative Caucus. Other major
figures opposing conscription include current Federal Reserve Chairman Alan
Greenspan and Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman.
2002 Ron Paul 20:10
In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to stand up for the
long-term military interests of the United States, individual liberty, and values
of the Declaration of Independence by cosponsoring my sense of Congress
resolution opposing reinstatement of the military draft.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr0321b02.htm