2001 Ron Paul 89:1
MR PAUL: Mr. Chairman: It is an honor
to have Secretary of State Colin Powell here to brief the committee on
the progress of the war on terrorism. I strongly support the
administrations efforts to seek out and punish those who attacked the
United States on 9/11 and those who supported and assisted them. I
fully recognize the difficult challenges inherent in this effort, and
that no real solution will be easily attained. With that said, I must
admit that several of the secretarys points have troubled me.
2001 Ron Paul 89:2
Secretary Powell has stated that our
fight does not end with the al-Qaida and the Taliban regime, going on
to quote President Bush, that our war begins with the al-Qaida, but it
does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of
global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated. Mr. Chairman, that
is a tall order. Does this Administration really mean to undertake
eradicating terrorism from every nation before we can declare victory?
Every war must have an exit-strategy, a point where victory can be
declared and our troops can be brought home. I fear that the objectives
as defined are sufficiently vague as to prevent us from doing so in the
foreseeable future. In fact, the secretarys statement suggests that
once our immediate objectives -- ridding the world of the al-Qaida
network and the Taliban government- are met, we intend to actually
widen the war.
2001 Ron Paul 89:3
Because I am concerned about winning
this
war at the least possible cost in American life and treasure, I have
introduced legislation to authorize the president to issue letters of
marque and reprisal. This legislation would give the president a
powerful tool to root out Osama bin Laden and his supporters. The
legislation would allow the United States to narrow the retaliation to
only the guilty parties, thus providing a political as well as military
victory. It would also address the increasingly complex problem of
asymmetrical warfare using a solution that had been employed
successfully in the past against a similar threat. I am disappointed to
see that this legislation has not been considered by Congress, and that
the Administration has not yet expressed its support for this bill.
2001 Ron Paul 89:4
I am also concerned about the
emerging
nation-building component of our activities in Afghanistan. If, as it
appears, our military action in Afghanistan is to benefit the Northern
Alliance opposition group, what assurances do we have that this group
will not be every bit as unpopular as the Taliban, as press reporting
suggests? Not long ago, it was the Taliban itself that was the
recipient of U.S. military and financial support. Who is to say that
Afghanistan might not benefit from a government managed by several
tribal factions with a weak central government and little outside
interference either by the U. S. or the UN? Some have suggested that a
western-financed pipeline through Afghanistan can only take place with
a strong and stable government in place – and that it is up to the
U.S. government to ensure the success of what is in fact a private
financial venture. Whatever the case, my colleagues in Congress and
those in the administration openly talk of a years-long post-war UN
presence in Afghanistan to build institutions.
2001 Ron Paul 89:5
The problem with nation-building is
simple: it does not work. From Bosnia to Kosovo to Somalia and points
beyond, have we seen even one successful example of UN nation-building?
Foreign nation-building results in repressive, unpopular regimes that
are seen by the population as Western creations. As such they are
inherently unstable, which itself leads to all the more oppression.
Indeed, many of our problems in the Middle East began when the CIA
placed the Shah in charge of Iran. It took 25 years before he was
overthrown, but when it finally happened the full extent of Iranian
resentment toward U.S. nation-building exploded into the headlines with
the kidnaping of more than 50 American citizens. It is a lesson we seem
to have forgotten.
2001 Ron Paul 89:6
Mr. Chairman, many Arabs believe we
saved Saddam Hussein in the Gulf War in order to justify our
continued presence there- to, in turn, keep Saudi Arabia and Kuwait
safe. In a recent interview, President George Bushs father,
President Bush, told CBS that he did not regret not going after Saddam
Hussein because what would have happened if wed done that is we would
have been alone. We would have been an occupying power in an Arab
land...And we would have seen something much worse than we have now,
because we would have had the enmity of all the gulf. These are
thoughtful words from the former president, however it appears to many
that this is exactly what we have done. And the result has been as
President Bush warned: we have earned the enmity of many on the Arab
streets, who regard our military presence on what they consider sacred
ground in Saudi Arabia as an open wound in the Middle East. Those who
say our policies have somehow justified the attacks against us are
terribly mistaken. It is a fact, however, that our policies have
needlessly alienated millions in the Arab world.
2001 Ron Paul 89:7
Our interventionist policies have not
only made enemies around the globe. Our own troops are spread so thin
defending foreign peoples and foreign lands, that when a crisis hit our
own shores we were forced to bring in foreign AWACs surveillance planes
to defend our country. That, more than anything else, underscores the
folly of our interventionist foreign policy: our own defense
establishment is unable to protect our citizens because it is too busy
defending foreign lands. We must focus our efforts on capturing and
punishing those who committed this outrageous act against the United
States. Then, if we are to be truly safe, we need a national debate on
our foreign policy; we need to look at interventionism and the enmity
it produces. We need to return to the sadly long-lost policy of
peaceful commerce and normal relations with all nations and entangling
alliances with none.
Note:
This statement was made before a committee, so it did not appear in Congressional Record. The text was posted in Ron Pauls Congressional website, and downloaded therefrom.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr101701B.htm