2001 Ron Paul 82:1
The CIA has a budget of over $30 billion. The FBI has a budget of $3 billion. In addition, $10 to $12
billion are specifically designated to fight terrorism. Yet, with all
this money and power, we were not warned of the events that befell us
on September 11th.
2001 Ron Paul 82:2
Since the tragic attacks,
our officials
have located and arrested hundreds of suspects, frozen millions of
dollars of assets, and received authority to launch a military attack
against the ringleaders in Afghanistan. It seems the war against the
terrorists, or guerillas if one really believes were in an actual war,
has so far been carried out satisfactorily, and under current law. The
question is, do we really need a war against the civil liberties of the
American people? We should never casually sacrifice any of our freedoms
for the sake of perceived security.
2001 Ron Paul 82:3
Most security, especially
in a free
society, is best carried out by individuals protecting their own
property and their own lives. The Founders certainly understood this
and is the main reason we have the Second amendment. We cannot have a
policeman stationed in each of our homes to prevent burglaries, but
owners of property with possession of a gun can easily do it. A new
giant agency for Homeland Security cannot provide security but it can
severely undermine our liberties. This approach may well in the long
run make many American feel less secure.
2001 Ron Paul 82:4
The principle of private
property
ownership did not work to prevent the tragedies of September 11th, and
theres a reason for that. The cries have gone out that due to the
failure of the airlines to protect us, we must nationalize every aspect
of aviation security. This reflects a serious error in judgment, and
will lead us further away from the principle of property ownership and
toward increasing government dependency and control, with further
sacrifice of our freedoms. More dollars and more federal control over
the airline industry are not likely to give us the security we all seek.
2001 Ron Paul 82:5
Industrial plants in the
United States
enjoy reasonably good security. They are protected, not by the local
police, but by owners putting up barbed wired fences, hiring guards
with guns, and requiring identification cards to enter-all this without
any violation of anyones civil liberties. And in a free society,
private owners have a right, if not an obligation, to engage in
"profiling" if it enhances security. This technique of providing
security through private property ownership is about to be rejected, in
its entirety, for the airline industry.
2001 Ron Paul 82:6
The problem was that the
principle of
private property was already undermined for the airlines by the partial
federalization of security by FAA regulations. Airports are all owned
by various government entities.
2001 Ron Paul 82:7
The system that failed us
prior to
September 11th not only was strictly controlled by government
regulations, it specifically denied the right of owners to defend their
property with a gun. At one time guns were permitted on airlines to
protect the US mail, but for more than 40 years airlines have not been
allowed to protect human life with firearms.
2001 Ron Paul 82:8
Some argue that pilots
have enough to do
worrying about flying the airplane and have no time to be concerned
about a gun. Yet why do we allow drivers of armored vehicles to handle
both? Why do we permit more protection for money being hauled around
the country in a truck than we do for passengers on an airline? If
government management of airline security has already failed us, why
should we expect expanding the role of government in this area to be
successful? One thing is for sure, we can expect it to get very
expensive and the lines to get a lot longer. The governments idea of
security is asking, "Who packed your bag," or "Has the bag been with
you since you packed it?" and requiring plastic knives to be used on
all flights while taking fingernail clippers from the pilots.
2001 Ron Paul 82:9
Pilots overwhelmingly
support their right
to be armed, with some even threatening not to fly if they are not
permitted to do so. This could be done quickly and cheaply by merely
removing the prohibition against it, as my bill HR 2896 would do. We
must not forget that four well-placed guns could have prevented the
entire tragedy of September 11th.
2001 Ron Paul 82:10
This is a crucial time in
our history.
Our policy of foreign interventionism has contributed to this
international crisis. How we define our enemies will determine how long
we fight and when the war is over. The expense will be worth it if we
make the right decisions. Targeting the forces of bin Laden makes
sense, but invading 8 to 10 countries without a precise goal will prove
to be a policy of folly. Indefinite war, growing in size and cost in
terms of dollars and lives, is something for which most Americans will
eventually grow weary. Our prayers are with our president, and we hope
that he continues to use wise judgment in accomplishing this difficult
task- something that he has accomplished remarkably well under very
difficult circumstances.
2001 Ron Paul 82:11
But here at home it is
surely a prime
responsibility of all members of Congress to remain vigilant and not,
out of fear and panic, sacrifice the rights of Americans in our effort
to maximize security.
2001 Ron Paul 82:12
Since the President has
already done a
good job in locating, apprehending, and de-funding those associated
with the September 11th attacks while using current existing laws, we
should not further sacrifice our liberties with a vague promise of
providing more security. We do not need a giant new national agency in
order to impose a concept of homeland security that challenges our
civil liberties. This is an idea whose time has not yet come.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr100901.htm