2001 Ron Paul 56:1 SEC.
801.
None of the funds appropriated in this Act may be used for any United
States contribution to the United Nations or any affiliated agency of
the United Nations.
2001 Ron Paul 56:2
The Chair
recognizes the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Paul).
2001 Ron Paul 56:3
Mr. PAUL.
Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
2001 Ron Paul 56:4
Let me
just read
the amendment because it is just three lines. It says, None of the
funds appropriated in this act may be used for any United States
contribution to the United Nations or any affiliated agency of the
United Nations. It would defund the United Nations. It would take
away the dues that we pay the United Nations as well as the amount of
money that we are paying to pay our back dues.
2001 Ron Paul 56:5
I think
this is
an appropriate time to discuss the reasonableness for our support for
the United Nations. The government of the United States has continued
to grow as our state sovereignty has gotten much smaller, but now we
are losing a lot of sovereignty to an international government which is
the United Nations. Just recently, the United States was humiliated by
being voted off by secret ballot from the U.N. Human Rights Commission
and Sudan was appointed in our place. How could anything be more
humiliating. So democracy ruled, our vote counted as one, the same
value as the vote of Red China or Sudan. But the whole notion that we
would be put off the Human Rights Commission and Sudan, where there is
a practice of slavery, is put on the Human Rights Commission should be
an insult to all of us.
2001 Ron Paul 56:6
In
committee, we
dealt with this problem and we said, Well, if the U.N. straightens
up, then well pay our dues this year; but maybe well withhold our
dues next year. That is very, very weak; and it does not show any
intent or show any rejection of what is going on in the United Nations.
2001 Ron Paul 56:7
It was
mentioned
earlier in debate on the gun issue that the U.N. is currently meeting
up in New York dealing with the gun issue. There have been explicit
proposals made at the United Nations to have worldwide gun control. No,
they are not taking guns away from the government. They are taking guns
away from civilians.
2001 Ron Paul 56:8
If
anybody
understands our history, they will know that taking guns from civilians
is exactly opposite of what the Founders intended. In a nation like
Afghanistan, they were able to defend the invasion of the Soviet Union
because individuals had guns. Likewise, when the Nazis were murdering
the Jews, the Jews had been denied the right to own guns. Now we are
talking about the United Nations having international gun laws. There
have been proposals made for an international tax on all financial
transactions. Yes, it is true, it has not been passed, but these are
the plans that have been laid and they are continued to be discussed
and they are moving in that direction.
2001 Ron Paul 56:9
Today we
have
international government that manages trade through the WTO. We have
international government that manages all international financial
transactions through the IMF. We have an international government that
manages welfare through the World Bank. Do these institutions really
help the poor people of the world? Hardly. They help the people who
control the hands of power in these international institutions and
generally they help the very wealthy, the bankers, and the
international corporations.
2001 Ron Paul 56:10
It was
said the
United Nations may have been set up to help preserve peace and help
poor people, but it just does not happen. The poor pay the taxes and
the international corporations gain the benefit.
2001 Ron Paul 56:11
The U.S.
has
taken a very strong position against endorsing the International
Criminal Court. The argument is legitimate. It says that, oh, someday
the International Criminal Court may arrest Americans because it just
may be that Americans may pursue illegal acts of war, like bombing
other countries and killing innocent people.
2001 Ron Paul 56:12
No, we do
not
want the international court to apply to us, but it is okay with our
money, our prestige and our pressure to endorse the International
Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia, so that we can go in there and arrest
the leaders that we have decided were the bad guys and leave the good
guys alone, as if there were not bad guys on both sides in Yugoslavia.
2001 Ron Paul 56:13
But this
presumption on our part that we can control the United Nations and
arrest only those individuals that we do not like and allow the other
ones to go free and that this will never apply to us, I think we are
missing the point and it is a dangerous trend. Because you say, well,
yes, we are powerful, we have the money and we have the weapons and we
can dictate to the United Nations. They will not arrest us or play
havoc with us. Yet at the same time we have already recognized that the
U.N. Human Rights Commission which was voted on by a democratic vote
kicked us in the face and kicked us off.
2001 Ron Paul 56:14
I think
this is a
time to think very seriously about whether this is wise to continue the
funding of the United Nations. I think that a statement ought to be
made. We should say, and the American people, I think, agree
overwhelmingly that it is about time that we quit policing the world
and paying the bills at the United Nations way out of proportion to our
representation and at the same time being humiliated by being kicked
off these commissions by majority vote.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr071801.htm