2001 Ron Paul 40:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chairman, I rise in
opposition to this bill, although I do
not contest for 1 minute the sincerity
and the good intentions of the many,
many cosponsors. I do not question the
problems that exist in Sudan. There is
no doubt that it is probably one of the
most horrible tales in human history.
2001 Ron Paul 40:2
But I do question a few things. First,
I question whether this is a proper
function for our government. I raised
this question in the committee, suggesting
that it could not be for national
security reasons, and it more or
less was conceded this has nothing to
do with national security but it had to
do with Americas soul. I was fascinated
that we are in the business of
saving souls these days.
2001 Ron Paul 40:3
But I do have serious concerns about
its effectiveness, because we have a
history of having done these kinds of
programs many times in the past, and
even in Africa. It was not too many
years ago that we were in Somalia and
we lost men. Our soldiers were dragged
in the streets. It was called nationbuilding.
This is, in a way, very much
nation-building, because we support
one faction over the thugs that are in
charge.
2001 Ron Paul 40:4
I certainly have all the sympathy
and empathy for those individuals who
are being abused, but the real question
is whether or not this will work. It did
not work in Somalia. We sent troops
into Haiti. Haiti is not better off. How
many men did we lose in Vietnam in an
effort to make sure the people we want
in power were in power?
2001 Ron Paul 40:5
So often these well-intended programs
just do not work and frequently
do the opposite by our aid ending up in
the hands of the supposed enemy. I seriously
question whether this one will,
either. Maybe in a year or 2 from now
we will realize that this is an effort
that did not produce the results that
we wanted. It is a $10 million appropriation,
small for what we do around
here, but we also know that this is only
the beginning, and there will be many
more tens of millions of dollars that
will be sent in hopes that we will satisfy
this problem.
2001 Ron Paul 40:6
Members can look for more problems
to solve, because right now there are
800,000 children serving in the military
in 41 countries of the world. That is another
big job we would have to take
upon ourselves to solve considering our
justification to be involved in Sudan.
2001 Ron Paul 40:7
Mr. Chairman, with HR 2052, the Sudan
Peace Act, we embark upon another episode
of interventionism, in continuing our illegitimate
and ill-advised mission to police the world. It
seemingly matters little to this body that it proceeds
neither with any constitutional authority
nor with the blessings of such historical figures
such as Jefferson who, in his first inaugural
address, argued for Peace, commerce and
honest friendship with all nations — entangling
alliances with none. Unfortunately, this is not
the only bit of history which seemingly is lost
on this Congress.
2001 Ron Paul 40:8
Apparently, it is also lost on this Congress
that the Constitution was a grant of limited
power to the federal government from the citizens
or, in other words, the Constitution was
not designed to allow the government to restrain
the people, but to allow the people to
restrain the government. Of course, the customary
lip service is given to the Constitution
insofar as the committee report for this bill follows
the rule of citing Constitutional authority
and cites Art. I, Section 8, which is where one
might look to find a specific enumerated
power. However, the report cites only clause
18 which begs some further citation. While
Clause 18 contains the necessary and proper
clause, it limits Congress to enacting laws
necessary and proper to some more specifically
(i.e. foregoing) enumerated power. Naturally,
no such foregoing authority is cited by
the advocates of this bill.
2001 Ron Paul 40:9
Without Constitutional authority, this bill
goes on to encourage the spending of $10
million of U.S. taxpayers hard-earned money
in Sudan but for what purpose? From the text
of the bill, we learn that The United States
should use all means of pressure available to
facilitate a comprehensive solution to the war
in Sudan, including (A) the multilateralization
of economic and diplomatic tools to compel
the Government of Sudan to enter into a good
faith peace process; [note that it says compel
. . . good faith peace] and (B) the support or
creation of viable democratic civil authority
and institutions in areas of Sudan outside of
government control. I believe we used to call
that nation-building before that term became
impolitic. How self-righteous a government is
ours which legally prohibits foreign campaign
contributions yet assumes it knows best and,
hence, supports dissident and insurgent
groups in places like Cuba, Sudan and around
the world. The practical problem here is that
we have funded dissidents in such places as
Somalia who ultimately turned out to be worse
than the incumbent governments. Small wonder
the U.S. is the prime target of citizen-terrorists
from countries with no real ability to retaliate
militarily for our illegitimate and immoral
interventions.
2001 Ron Paul 40:10
The legislative tools to be used to facilitate
this aforementioned comprehensive solution
are as frightening as the nation-building
tactics. For example, It is the sense of the
Congress that . . . the United Nations should
be used as a tool to facilitate peace and recovery
in Sudan.
2001 Ron Paul 40:11
One can only assume this is the same
United Nations which booted the United States
off its Human Rights Commission in favor of,
as Canadian Sen. Jerahmiel S. Grafstein,
called them recently, those exemplars of
human rights nations . . . Algeria, China,
Saudi Arabia, Uganda, Armenia, Pakistan,
Syria and Vietnam.
2001 Ron Paul 40:12
The bill does not stop there, however, in intervening
in the civil war in Sudan. It appears
that this Congress has found a new mission
for the Securities and Exchange Commission
who are now tasked with investigating the nature
and extent of . . . commercial activity in
Sudan as it relates to any violations of religious
freedom and human rights in Sudan. It
seems we have finally found a way to spend
those excessive fees the SEC has been collecting
from mutual fund investors despite the
fact we cannot seem to bring to the floor a bill
to actually reduce those fees which have been
collected in multiples above what is necessary
to fund this agencies previous (and again unconstitutional)
mission.
2001 Ron Paul 40:13
There is more, however. Buried deep within
the bill in Section 9 we find what may be the
real motivation for the intervention — Oil. It
seems the bill also tasks the Secretary of
State with generating a report detailing a description
of the sources and current status of
Sudans financing and construction of infrastructure
and pipelines for oil exploitation, the
effects of such financing and construction on
the inhabitants of the regions in which the oil
fields are located. Talk about corporate welfare
and the ability to socialize the costs of
foreign competitive market research on the
U.S. taxpayer!
2001 Ron Paul 40:14
Yes, Mr. Chairman, this bill truly has it all —
an unconstitutional purpose, the morally bankrupt
intervention in dealings between the affairs
of foreign governments and their respective
citizens in our attempt to police the world,
more involvement by a United Nations proven
inept at resolving civil conflicts abroad, the expansion
of the SEC into State Department
functions and a little corporate welfare for big
oil, to boot. How can one not support these
legislative efforts?
2001 Ron Paul 40:15
Mr. Chairman, I oppose this bill for each of
the above-mentioned reasons and leave to the
ingenuity, generosity, and conscience of each
individual in this country to make their own private
decision as to how best render help to
citizens of Sudan and all countries where
human rights violations run rampant.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr061301.htm