2001 Ron Paul 31:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr.
Speaker, today, as we are getting ready to adjourn, we have left the
foreign relations authorization bill unfinished. I serve on the
Committee on International Relations, and I was anxious to present
several amendments in dealing with especially the United Nations.
Unfortunately, those amendments were not permitted.
2001 Ron Paul 31:2
The amendments
that we are dealing with I see as being very small token efforts to
improve the bill, but not really dealing with the essence of whether or
not we should be in the United Nations or further funding the
peacekeeping missions and doing many of the things that I believe
sincerely should not be engaged in if we followed the Constitution, and
many Americans agree with this.
2001 Ron Paul 31:3
I think we are at
a point now where a growing number of Americans feel like we are not
getting a fair shake from the United Nations. I have been preaching
this message for quite a few years, but I believe the United Nations
itself is starting to make my point.
2001 Ron Paul 31:4
Just recently, in
the last week, the United States was kicked off the Human Rights
Commission, as well as the International Narcotics Control Board. This
is an affront to our dignity and ought to point out to us that,
although we pay the largest amount of money for peacekeeping missions
and the largest amount of dues, here it is that, because there is
disagreement, we are humiliated by being kicked off these commissions.
2001 Ron Paul 31:5
I do not see the
benefits of belonging to the United Nations. I see too many
disadvantages. If it were just a discussion group and trying to bring
people together, that would be one thing; but we have gone to an
extreme. This is an extreme position, as far as I am concerned, to
belong to the United Nations and deliver so much of our sovereignty to
the United Nations today.
2001 Ron Paul 31:6
Essentially since
World War II, we have gone to war under U.N. resolutions. No longer
does the President come to the Congress and ask for a declaration of
war. U.N. resolutions are passed, and we send our troops throughout the
world fighting and being engaged in war. That is not the way it is
supposed to be. The Constitution is very clear on when we should be
involved in war.
2001 Ron Paul 31:7
The conditions
are not improving at all. They are asking for more and more funding. At
the same time we sacrifice more and more of our sovereignty. On
occasion we will stand up and say no, we do not want to participate in
the Kyoto treaty or the International Criminal Court, and that is good.
But the whole idea of this world government under the United Nations I
think is something we should really challenge.
2001 Ron Paul 31:8
Just January of
this past year, it was noted that the United Nations proposed for the
first time, although not ready to be passed, that we have an
international tax placed on currency transactions to raise billions of
dollars to be spent for international activities. Now, you say well,
that is probably just a proposal and it will never happen. But even
today, in Bosnia, the United Nations peacekeepers over there are tax
collectors. There are not enough revenues being collected for certain
governments, and the UN peacekeepers are there collecting taxes. So it is already
happening that we are involved in tax collecting.
2001 Ron Paul 31:9
I think that is the
wrong way to go, and certainly we should be considering slashing these
funds. I would have liked to have seen the removal of all the funds for
peacekeeping missions. There is no national sovereignty reasons why we
should put American troops under U.N. command in areas like Bosnia. I
think that is the wrong way to go, I do not think the American people
support this, and that we should reconsider our position and our
relationship in the United Nations.
2001 Ron Paul 31:10
There are
hundreds of millions of dollars here for population control around the
world. Some would say, well, as long as we write some little sentence
in here and say please do not use any of the money for abortion,
that will alleviate their conscience about sending tax dollars over to
do abortions in places like China and other places in the world. Well,
that does not work, because all funds are fungible. Funds can be
shifted around. If we send the money, it can be used. If we
specifically say do not use them, they can just shift the funds
around, so I see that as not being a very good idea.
2001 Ron Paul 31:11
I would like to
strike all the funds for population control. If we feel compelled to
help other countries and teach them about birth control, it should be
done voluntarily and through missionary work or some other way, but not
to tax the American people and force them to subsidize events like
abortion.
This chapter appeared in Ron Pauls Congressional website at http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr051001.htm