Mr. KOLBE. Mr. Chairman, I move to
strike the last word, and I yield to the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. PAUL).
(Mr. PAUL asked and was given permission
to revise and extend his remarks.)
2004 Ron Paul 61:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding to me.
2004 Ron Paul 61:2
I appreciate the opportunity to spend 5 minutes on an issue that I wanted to
bring up in the form of an amendment,
and that deals with the $300 million
that will be going to Pakistan. And I
call this to attention because I think it
is a very unwise expenditure. But I
want to make my case for this in the
context of overall foreign policy.
2004 Ron Paul 61:3
Essentially for 100 years, we have accepted the foreign policy of Woodrow
Wilson. It is a flawed idealism that we
should, and it is our responsibility to,
make the world safe for democracy.
That did not just exist for World War I,
which led to a peace treaty which
caused a lot of problems leading up to
World War II; but those notions are
well engrained in the current
neoconservative approach to foreign
policy and the policy that this administration
follows. But I do not think it
is in the best interests of our country
to follow this.
2004 Ron Paul 61:4
The advice of the Founders was that we should be more balanced in our approach
and not favoring special nations,
not giving money or weapons or
getting involved in any alliances with
the different nations of the world and
we would all be better off for it.
2004 Ron Paul 61:5
I believe that this policy is a failure and has been very costly. If we think
about the last 100 years how many lives
were lost, how much blood has been
spilled, how many dollars have been
spent in this effort to make the world
safe for democracy, the world is probably
as unsafe now as it has ever been.
And here we are. We are proposing that
we send $300 million under this policy
to Pakistan.
2004 Ron Paul 61:6
We are in Iraq to promote democracy, but here we send money to a military
dictator who overthrew an elected
government. And there just seems to
be a tremendous inconsistency here.
There was a military coup in 1999.
There is the strong possibility that
Osama bin Laden may well be in Pakistan.
And to actually send money
there, we are prohibited from really
going in there and looking for Osama
bin Laden; so we give the government
of Pakistan money in the hopes that
they will be helpful to us.
2004 Ron Paul 61:7
There is quite a bit of difference between the foreign policy of neutrality
and friendship with everyone versus
giving money and support to everyone.
And if we look at our history, it has
not worked very well. We have in the
past given money to both sides of a lot
of wars, and right now we try to be
friends and we give money in support
to both India and Pakistan. I do not
bring this amendment up here to be pro
either one or anti either one. I want to
have a pro-American foreign policy and
not say, well, I want to punish Pakistan
and help India or vice versa.
2004 Ron Paul 61:8
We have helped people who have been arch enemies for years. Take Greece
and Turkey. We helped both sides. But
not only do we help both sides of a lot
of these fights that have been going on
for a long time, we literally help our
enemies. Just think of the support we
gave Osama bin Laden when he was
fighting the Russians in Afghanistan
and just think of our alliance with Saddam
Hussein in the 1980s when we did
provide him with a lot of destructive
weapons. That type of policy does not
add up. It does not make a lot of sense.
It is not in our best interests, and my
suggestion here is hopefully somewhere
along the way, we will take a serious
look at this and redirect our foreign
policy.
2004 Ron Paul 61:9
But, specifically, is it a wise expenditure to put $300 million into the government
of Pakistan with the pretense
that we are promoting democracy by
supporting a military dictator at the
same time our young men are dying in
Iraq promoting democracy? It does not
add up, and it suggests that there are
other motives for some of these expenditures
and some of our motivations
around the world.
2004 Ron Paul 61:10
In the past we have been arch enemies of Libya, but now we have decided
they will be our friends. And I am
not against that in particular, but I am
against giving them subsidies and helping
them out.
2004 Ron Paul 61:11
There is such a difference between neutrality and friendship and that of
giving weapons and arms and promoting
antagonisms.