HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
BEFORE THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 16, 2003
We Cannot Afford Another $87 Billion in Iraq
2003 Ron Paul 98:1
Mr. Speaker, the neo-conservative
media machine has been hard at work lately drumming up support for the
$87
billion appropriation to extend our precarious occupation of Iraq.
Opposition to
this funding, according to the Secretary of Defense, encourages our
enemies and
hinders the war against terrorism. This is a distortion of the facts
and is
nothing more than attacking the messenger when one disapproves of the
message.
2003 Ron Paul 98:2
Those
within the administration, prior to the war, who warned of the dangers
and real
costs were fired. Yet now it turns out that they were correct, that it
would not
be a cakewalk, that it would require a lot more troops, and costs would
far
exceed original expectations.
2003 Ron Paul 98:3
The
President recently reminded us that we went into Iraq to force its
compliance
with U.N. resolutions, since the U.N. itself was not up to the task. It
was not
for national security reasons. Yet we all know that the U.N. never
endorsed this
occupation.
2003 Ron Paul 98:4
The
question we in the Congress ought to ask is this: What if our efforts
to
westernize and democratize Iraq do not work? Who knows? Many believe
that our
pursuit of nation building in Iraq will actually make things worse in
Iraq, in
the entire Middle East, throughout the entire Muslim world, and even
here in the
United States.
2003 Ron Paul 98:5
This
is a risky venture, and new funding represents an escalation of our
efforts to
defend a policy that has little chance of working.
2003 Ron Paul 98:6
Since
no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq, nor any evidence
that the
army of Saddam Hussein could have threatened the security of any
nation, let
alone the United States, a new reason is now given to justify an
endless
entanglement in a remote area of the world 6,000 miles from our
homeland.
2003 Ron Paul 98:7
We
are now told that we must occupy Iraq to fight the terrorists that
attacked us
on 9/11. Yet not one shred of evidence has been produced to show that
the Iraqi
government had anything to do with 9/11 or any affiliation with
al-Qaeda.
2003 Ron Paul 98:8
The
American people are first told they have to sacrifice to pay for the
bombing of
Iraq. Now they must accept the fact that they must pay to rebuild it.
If they
complain, they will be accused of being unpatriotic and not supporting
the
troops. I wonder what a secret poll of our troops would reveal about
whether
they thought public support for bringing them home next week indicated
a lack of
support for their well-being.
2003 Ron Paul 98:9
Some
believe that by not raising taxes to pay for the war we can fund it on
the
cheap. We cannot. When deficits
skyrocket the federal government prints more money, the people are
effectively
taxed by losing value in their savings and in their paychecks. The
inflation tax
is a sinister and evil way to pay for unpopular wars. It has been done
that way
for centuries.
2003 Ron Paul 98:10
Mr.
Speaker, I guess we shouldnt worry because we can find a way to pay
for it.
Already we are charging our wounded soldiers $8.10 a day for food when
recuperating in a hospital from their war injuries.
We also know that other soldiers are helping out by buying
their own night vision goggles, GPS devices, short wave radios,
backpacks, and
even shoes! So I suppose we can
fund the war that way. It does not
seem like much of a bother to cut veterans benefits. Besides, many
conservatives for years have argued that deficits do not really matter,
only tax
rates do. So let us just quit worrying about deficits and this $87
billion
supplemental. Of course I’m being
sarcastic.
2003 Ron Paul 98:11
Seriously,
though, funding for this misadventure should be denied no matter how
well-meaning its supporters are. To expect a better world to come from
force of
arms abroad and confiscatory taxation at home is nothing but a grand
illusion.
The sooner we face the reality, the better.
2003 Ron Paul 98:12
While
we nation-build in Iraq in the name of defeating terrorism, we ignore
our
responsibilities to protect our borders at home while we compromise the
liberties of our citizens with legislation like the Patriot Act.
2003 Ron Paul 98:13
There
are two main reasons we need to reject the foreign policy of the past
50 years
that has been used to rationalize our presence in Iraq. First, the
practical: We
cannot expect to force western, U.S.-style democracy on a nation that
for over
1,000 years learned to live with and accept an Islamic-based legal
system.
No matter what we say or believe, to the Iraqis they have been
invaded by
the Christian west, and whether it is the United States, U.N. or
European troops
that are sent to teach them the ways of the west it will not matter.
2003 Ron Paul 98:14
Second,
we have no constitutional authority to police the world or involve
ourselves in
nation building, in making the world safe for our style of democracy.
Our
founders advised against it and the early presidents followed that
advice. If we
believe strongly in our ideals, the best way to spread them is to set a
good
example so that others will voluntarily emulate us. Force will not
work.
Besides, we do not have the money. The $87 billion appropriations
request should
be rejected.