HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 29, 2003
America National Sovereignty vs. UN International Law – Time for Congress to Vote
2003 Ron Paul 51:1
Mr. Speaker, I rise to urge the leadership of this body to bring a very important vote to the House floor.
I recently reintroduced HR 1146, the American
Sovereignty Restoration Act, which would end our participation in the
United Nations. Millions of Americans have
begun to question why we continue to spend $300 million each year
funding and housing an organization that is actively hostile to American interests.
Surely Congress, which routinely spends 15 minutes renaming post
offices, can spare 15 minutes to vote on this fundamental issue of American
sovereignty.
2003 Ron Paul 51:2
Obviously many Americans now want to get out of the UN because they resent its refusal to sanction our war in Iraq.
The administration deserves some credit for ultimately upholding
the principle that American national security is not a matter of
international consensus, and that we don’t need UN authorization to act.
But the administration sent mixed signals by doing everything
possible to obtain such authorization, and by citing UN resolutions as
justification for our actions. The message seems to be
that the UN is credible when we control it and it does what we want,
but lacks all credibility when it refuses to do our bidding.
2003 Ron Paul 51:3
Perhaps it’s time to stop trying to manipulate the UN, and start asserting our national sovereignty.
2003 Ron Paul 51:4
If we do not, rest assured that the UN will continue to interfere not only in our nation’s foreign policy matters, but in our
domestic policies as well. UN globalists are
not satisfied by meddling only in international disputes.
They increasingly want to influence our domestic
environmental, trade, labor, tax, and gun laws.
UN global planners fully intend to expand the organization into
a true world government, complete with taxes, courts, and possibly a standing
army. This is not an alarmist statement; these goals are readily
promoted on the UN’s own website. UN planners do not
care about national sovereignty; in fact they are openly opposed to it. They
correctly view it as an obstacle to their plans.
They simply aren’t interested in our Constitution and republican
form of government.
2003 Ron Paul 51:5
The choice is very clear: we either follow the Constitution
or submit to UN global governance. American
national sovereignty cannot survive if we allow our domestic laws to be
crafted
or even influenced by an international body.
This needs to be stated publicly more often.
If we continue down the UN path, America as we know it will
cease to
exist.
2003 Ron Paul 51:6
Noted constitutional scholar Herb Titus has thoroughly
researched the United Nations and its purported “authority.”
Titus explains that the UN Charter is not a treaty at all, but
rather a
blueprint for supranational government that directly violates the
Constitution.
As such, the Charter is neither politically nor legally binding
upon the
American people or government. The
UN has no authority to make “laws” that bind American citizens, because
it
does not derive its powers from the consent of the American people.
We need to stop speaking of UN resolutions and edicts as if they
represented legitimate laws or treaties. They
do not.
2003 Ron Paul 51:7
In conclusion, Mr.
Speaker,
I’m merely asking House leadership to schedule vote on HR 1146.
Americans deserve to know how their representatives stand on the
critical
issue of American sovereignty.