2002 Ron Paul 19:1
I was recently asked why I thought it was a bad idea for the
President to
initiate a war against Iraq. I responded by saying that I could easily
give a
half a dozen reasons why; and if I took a minute, I could give a full
dozen. For
starters, here is a half a dozen.
2002 Ron Paul 19:2
Number one, Congress has not given the President the legal authority
to wage
war against Iraq as directed by the Constitution, nor does he have U.N.
authority to do so. Even if he did, it would not satisfy the rule of
law laid
down by the Framers of the Constitution.
2002 Ron Paul 19:3
Number two, Iraq has not initiated aggression against the United
States.
Invading Iraq and deposing Saddam Hussein, no matter how evil a
dictator he may
be, has nothing to do with our national security. Iraq does not have a
single
airplane in its air force and is a poverty-ridden third world nation,
hardly a
threat to U.S. security. Stirring up a major conflict in this region
will
actually jeopardize our security.
2002 Ron Paul 19:4
Number three, a war against Iraq initiated by the United States
cannot be
morally justified. The argument that someday in the future Saddam
Hussein might
pose a threat to us means that any nation, any place in the world is
subject to
an American invasion without cause. This would be comparable to the
impossibility of proving a negative.
2002 Ron Paul 19:5
Number four, initiating a war against Iraq will surely antagonize
all
neighboring Arab and Muslim nations as well as the Russians, the
Chinese, and
the European Union, if not the whole world. Even the English people are
reluctant to support Tony Blairs prodding of our President to invade
Iraq.
There is no practical benefit for such action. Iraq could end up in
even more
dangerous hands like Iran.
2002 Ron Paul 19:6
Number five, an attack on Iraq will not likely be confined to Iraq
alone.
Spreading the war to Israel and rallying all Arab nations against her
may well
end up jeopardizing the very existence of Israel. The President has
already
likened the current international crisis more to that of World War II
than the
more localized Vietnam war. The law of unintended consequences applies
to
international affairs every bit as much as to domestic interventions,
yet the
consequences of such are much more dangerous.
2002 Ron Paul 19:7
Number six, the cost of a war against Iraq would be prohibitive. We
paid a
heavy economic price for the Vietnam war in direct cost, debt and
inflation.
This coming war could be a lot more expensive. Our national debt is
growing at a
rate greater than $250 billion per year. This will certainly
accelerate. The
dollar cost will be the least of our concerns compared to the potential
loss of
innocent lives, both theirs and ours. The systematic attack on civil
liberties
that accompanies all wars cannot be ignored. Already we hear cries for
resurrecting the authoritarian program of constriction in the name of
patriotism, of course.
2002 Ron Paul 19:8
Could any benefit come from all this warmongering? Possibly. Let us
hope and
pray so. It should be evident that big government is anathema to
individual
liberty. In a free society, the role of government is to protect the
individuals right to life and liberty. The biggest government of all,
the U.N.
consistently threatens personal liberties and U.S. sovereignty. But our
recent
move toward unilateralism hopefully will inadvertently weaken the
United
Nations. Our participation more often than not lately is conditioned on
following the international rules and courts and trade agreements only
when they
please us, flaunting the consensus, without rejecting internationalism
on
principle- as we should.
2002 Ron Paul 19:9
The way these international events will eventually play out is
unknown, and
in the process we expose ourselves to great danger. Instead of
replacing todays
international government, (the United Nations, the IMF, the World Bank,
the WTO,
the international criminal court) with free and independent republics,
it is
more likely that we will see a rise of militant nationalism with a
penchant for
solving problems with arms and protectionism rather than free trade and
peaceful
negotiations.
2002 Ron Paul 19:10
The last thing this world needs is the development of more nuclear
weapons,
as is now being planned in a pretense for ensuring the peace. We would
need more
than an office of strategic information to convince the world of that.
2002 Ron Paul 19:11
What do we need? We need a clear understanding and belief in a free
society,
a true republic that protects individual liberty, private property,
free
markets, voluntary exchange and private solutions to social problems,
placing
strict restraints on government meddling in the internal affairs of
others.