HON. RON PAUL OF TEXAS
Before the U.S. House of Representatives
March 28, 2006
Making the
World Safe for Christianity
The
top Neo-Con of the twentieth century was Woodrow Wilson.
His supposed idealism, symbolized in the slogan “Make the world safe
for democracy,” resulted in untold destruction and death across the world for
many decades. His deceit and
manipulation of the pre-war intelligence from Europe dragged America into an
unnecessary conflict that cost the world and us dearly.
Without the disastrous Versailles Treaty, World War II could have been
averted-- and the rise to power of Communists around the world might have been
halted.
We
seem to never learn from our past mistakes.
Today’s neo-cons are as idealistically misled and aggressive in
remaking the Middle East as the Wilsonian do-gooders.
Even given the horrendous costs of the Iraq War and the unintended
consequences that plague us today, the neo-cons are eager to expand their regime
change policy to Iran by force.
The
obvious shortcomings of our regime change and occupation of Afghanistan are now
readily apparent. The Taliban was ousted from power, but they have regrouped
and threaten the delicate stability that now exists in that country.
Opium drug production is once again a major operation, with drugs lords
controlling a huge area of the country outside Kabul.
And now the real nature of the government we created has been revealed in
the case of Abdul Rahman, the Muslim who faced a possible death sentence from
the Karzai administration for converting to Christianity.
Even now that Mr. Rahman is free due to western pressure, his life
remains in danger.
Our
bombs and guns haven’t changed the fact that the new puppet Afghan government
still follows Sharia law. The same
loyalty to Sharia exists in Iraq, where we’re trying so hard to stabilize
things. And all this is done in the name of spreading democracy.
The sad fact is that even under the despicable rule of Saddam Hussein, Christians were safer in Iraq than they are today. Saddam Hussein’s foreign minister was a practicing Christian. Today thousands of Christians have fled Iraq following our occupation, to countries like Jordan and Syria. Those Christians who have remained in Iraq fear for their lives every day. That should tell us something about the shortcomings of a policy that presumes to make the world safe for democracy.
The
Muslim world is not fooled by our talk about spreading democracy and values.
The evidence is too overwhelming that we do not hesitate to support
dictators and install puppet governments when it serves our interests.
When democratic elections result in the elevation of a leader or party
not to our liking, we do not hesitate for a minute to undermine that government.
This hypocrisy is rarely recognized by the American people.
It’s much more comfortable to believe in slogans, to believe that
we’re defending our goodness and spreading true liberty.
We accept this and believe strongly in the cause, strongly enough to
sacrifice many of our sons and daughters, and stupendous amounts of money, to
spread our ideals through force.
Pointing
out the lack of success is taboo. It
seems of little concern to many members of Congress that we lack both the moral
right and constitutional authority to impose our will on other nations.
The
toughest task is analyzing what we do from their perspective.
We should try harder to place ourselves in the shoes of those who live in
the Arab countries where our efforts currently are concentrated.
We are outraged by a Muslim country that would even consider the death
penalty for a Christian convert. But
many Muslims see all that we do as a reflection of western Christianity, which
to them includes Europe and America. They
see everything in terms of religion.
When
our bombs and sanctions kill hundreds of thousands of their citizens, they see
it as an attack on their religion by Christians.
To them our actions represent a crusade to change their culture and their
political systems. They do not see
us as having noble intentions. Cynicism
and realism tell them we’re involved in the Middle East to secure the oil we
need.
Our occupation and influence in the holy lands of the Middle East will always be suspect. This includes all the countries of the Arabian Peninsula, Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Naively believing otherwise will guarantee continuing hostilities in Iraq. Our meddling will remain an incitement for radicals to strike us here at home in future terrorist attacks. All the intelligence gathering in the world will serve little purpose if we don’t come to understand exactly why they hate us-- despite the good intentions that many Americans hold dear.