2009 Ron Paul 67:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition
to this conference report on the War
Supplemental Appropriations. I wonder what
happened to all of my colleagues who said
they were opposed to the ongoing wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan. I wonder what happened to
my colleagues who voted with me as I opposed
every war supplemental request under
the previous administration. It seems, with
very few exceptions, they have changed their
position on the war now that the White House
has changed hands. I find this troubling. As I
have said while opposing previous war funding
requests, a vote to fund the war is a vote in
favor of the war. Congress exercises its constitutional
prerogatives through the power of
the purse.
2009 Ron Paul 67:2
This conference report, being a Washington-
style compromise, reflects one thing Congress
agrees on: spending money we do not have.
So this compromise bill spends 15 percent
more than the president requested, which is
$9 billion more than in the original House bill
and $14.6 billion more than the original Senate
version. Included in this final version – in
addition to the $106 billion to continue the
wars in Afghanistan and Iraq – is a $108 billion
loan guarantee to the International Monetary
Fund, allowing that destructive organization to
continue spending taxpayer money to prop up
corrupt elites and promote harmful economic
policies overseas.
2009 Ron Paul 67:3
As Americans struggle through the worst
economic downturn since the Great Depression,
this emergency supplemental appropriations
bill sends billions of dollars overseas as
foreign aid. Included in this appropriation is
$660 million for Gaza, $555 million for Israel,
$310 million for Egypt, $300 million for Jordan,
and $420 million for Mexico. Some $889 million
will be sent to the United Nations for
peacekeeping missions. Almost one billion
dollars will be sent overseas to address the
global financial crisis outside our borders and
nearly $8 billion will be spent to address a
potential pandemic flu.
2009 Ron Paul 67:4
Mr. Speaker, I continue to believe that the
best way to support our troops is to bring
them home from Iraq and Afghanistan. If one
looks at the original authorization for the use
of force in Afghanistan, it is clear that the ongoing
and expanding nation-building mission
there has nothing to do with our goal of capturing
and bringing to justice those who attacked
the United States on September 11,
2001. Our continued presence in Iraq and Afghanistan
does not make us more safe at
home, but in fact it undermines our national
security. I urge my colleagues to defeat this
reckless conference report.