2007 Ron Paul 78:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I strongly oppose any move to initiate further sanctions on Iran.
Sanctions are acts of war, and expanding
sanctions on Iran serves no purpose other
than preparing the American people for an
eventual attack on Iran. This is the same pattern
we saw in the run up to the war on Iraq:
Congress passes legislation calling for regime
change, sanctions are imposed, and eventually
we are told that only an attack will solve
the problem. We should expect the same tragic
result if we continue down this path. I urge
my colleagues to reconsider.
2007 Ron Paul 78:2
I oppose economic sanctions for two very simple reasons. First, they dont work as effective
foreign policy. Time after time, from Cuba
to China to Iraq, we have failed to unseat despotic
leaders or change their policies by refusing
to trade with the people of those nations.
If anything, the anti-American sentiment
aroused by sanctions often strengthens the
popularity of such leaders, who use America
as a convenient scapegoat to divert attention
from their own tyranny. History clearly shows
that free and open trade does far more to liberalize
oppressive governments than trade
wars. Economic freedom and political freedom
are inextricably linked — when people get a
taste of goods and information from abroad,
they are less likely to tolerate a closed society
at home. So sanctions mostly harm innocent
citizens and do nothing to displace the governments
we claim as enemies.
2007 Ron Paul 78:3
Second, sanctions simply hurt American industries, particularly agriculture. Every market
we close to our nations farmers is a market
exploited by foreign farmers. China, Russia,
the Middle East, North Korea, and Cuba all
represent huge markets for our farm products,
yet many in Congress favor current or proposed
trade restrictions that prevent our farmers
from selling to the billions of people in
these areas.
2007 Ron Paul 78:4
We must keep in mind that Iran has still not been found in violation of the Non-Proliferation
Treaty. Furthermore, much of the information
regarding Irans nuclear program is coming to
us via thoroughly discredited sources like the
MeK, a fanatical cult that is on our State Departments
terror list. Additionally, the same
discredited neo-conservatives who pushed us
into the Iraq war are making similarly exaggerated
claims against Iran. How often do these
experts have to be proven wrong before we
start to question their credibility?
2007 Ron Paul 78:5
It is said that we non-interventionists are somehow isolationists because we dont
want to interfere in the affairs of foreign nations.
But the real isolationists are those who
demand that we isolate certain peoples overseas
because we disagree with the policies of
their leaders. The best way to avoid war, to
promote American values, and to spread real
freedom and liberty is to engage in trade and
contacts with the rest of the world as broadly
as possible.
2007 Ron Paul 78:6
I urge my colleagues to reconsider this counterproductive and dangerous move toward
further sanctions on Iran.