Mr. Speaker, I yield 7 minutes to the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. PAUL).
(Mr. PAUL asked and was given permission
to revise and extend his remarks.)
2007 Ron Paul 26:1
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding, and I rise in
support of the resolution and in opposition
to the escalation in Iraq. I want to
thank the gentleman from North Carolina
for his very determined and principled
effort to end this ill-advised and
dangerous war, and I am very pleased
that he brought together a group of
Members today who are representing
the traditional conservative position
on war and peace and I deeply appreciate
that.
2007 Ron Paul 26:2
Mr. Speaker, this grand debate is welcomed, but it could be that this is
nothing more than a distraction from
the dangerous military confrontation
approaching with Iran, which is supported
by many in leadership on both
sides of the aisle. This resolution, unfortunately,
does not address the disaster
in Iraq. Instead, it appears to oppose
the war while at the same time offering
no change of the status quo in
Iraq.
2007 Ron Paul 26:3
As such, it is not actually a vote against a troop surge. A real vote
against a troop surge is a vote against
the coming supplemental appropriation
which finances it. I hope all my colleagues
who vote against this surge
today will vote against the budgetary
surge when it really counts, when we
vote on the supplemental.
2007 Ron Paul 26:4
The biggest red herring in this debate is the constant innuendo that those
who dont support expanding the war
are somehow opposing the troops. It is
nothing more than a canard to claim
that those of us who struggled to prevent
the bloodshed and now want it
stopped are somehow less patriotic and
less concerned about the welfare of our
military personnel.
2007 Ron Paul 26:5
Osama bin Laden has expressed sadistic pleasure with the invasion in Iraq
and was surprised that we served his
interests above and beyond his dreams
on how we responded after the 9/11 attacks.
His pleasure comes from our policy
of folly, getting ourselves bogged
down in the middle of a religious civil
war 7,000 miles from home that is financially
bleeding us to death. Total
costs now are recently estimated to exceed
$2 trillion. His recruitment of Islamic
extremists has been greatly enhanced
by our occupation of Iraq.
2007 Ron Paul 26:6
Unfortunately, we continue to concentrate on the obvious mismanagement
of a war promoted by false information
and ignore debating the real
issue which is this: Why are we determined
to follow a foreign policy of empire
building and preemption which is
unbecoming of a constitutional republic?
2007 Ron Paul 26:7
Those on the right should recall that the traditional conservative position of
nonintervention was their position for
most of the 20th century, and they benefited
politically from the wars carelessly
entered into by the left. Seven
years ago, the right benefited politically
by condemning the illegal intervention
in Kosovo and Somalia. At the
time, the right was outraged over the
failed policy of nation building.
2007 Ron Paul 26:8
It is important to recall that the left in 2003 offered little opposition to the
preemptive war in Iraq, and many are
now not willing to stop it by defunding
it, or work to prevent an attack on
Iran.
2007 Ron Paul 26:9
The catch-all phrase the war on terrorism in all honesty has no more
meaning than if one wants to wage a
war against criminal gangsterism. Terrorism
is a tactic. You cant have a war
against a tactic. It is deliberately
vague and nondefinable in order to justify
and permit perpetual war anywhere
and under any circumstances.
Dont forget, the Iraqis and Saddam
Hussein had nothing to do with any
terrorist attack against us, including
that on 9/11.
2007 Ron Paul 26:10
Special interests and the demented philosophy of conquests have driven
most wars throughout all of history.
Rarely has the cause of liberty, as it
was in our own Revolution, been the
driving force. In recent decades, our
policies have been driven by
neoconservative empire radicalism,
profiteering in the military-industrial
complex, misplaced do-good internationalism,
mercantilistic notions regarding
the need to control natural resources,
and blind loyalty to various
governments in the Middle East.
2007 Ron Paul 26:11
For all the misinformation given the American people to justify our invasion,
such as our need for national security,
enforcing U.N. resolutions, removing
a dictator, establishing a democracy,
protecting our oil, the argument
has been reduced to this: If we
leave now, Iraq will be left in a mess;
implying the implausible, that if we
stay, it wont be a mess.
2007 Ron Paul 26:12
Since it could go badly when we leave, that blame must be placed on
those who took us there, not on those
of us who now insist that Americans no
longer need be killed or maimed, and
that Americans no longer need to kill
any more Iraqis. We have had enough
of both.
2007 Ron Paul 26:13
Resorting to a medical analogy: A wrong diagnosis was made at the beginning
of the war and the wrong treatment
was prescribed. Refusing to reassess
our mistakes and insisting on just
more and more of a failed remedy is
destined to kill the patient. In this
case, the casualties will be our liberties
and prosperity, here at home,
and peace abroad.
2007 Ron Paul 26:14
There is no logical reason to reject the restraints placed in the Constitution
regarding our engaging in foreign
conflicts unrelated to our national security.
The advice of the founders and
our early Presidents was sound then,
and it is sound today.
2007 Ron Paul 26:15
We shouldnt wait until our financial system is completely ruined and we are
forced to change our ways. We should
do it as quickly as possible and stop
the carnage and the financial bleeding
that will bring us to our knees and
eventually force us to stop that which
we should have never started.
2007 Ron Paul 26:16
We all know in time the war will be defunded one way or another and the
troops will come home. So why not
now?